Its on you're signature. But God is the God of order...not disorder.
Yeah you're pretty right. This one isnt even fun. At least Nick liked to party like it was the 80s: cocaine and AIDS with cheap Sunset Strip hookers.
If I had it all to do over again I would trade those metal years for a scholarship to a prestige Seminary and master Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic and Latin. Then I would take that knowledge and translate the first ever English Bible containing zero translation errors.
What
Its all good. No big deal. Your joking is just something unseen on facebook these days. Even many forums would ban you for that. Facebook would disable your account for that. I'm not saying its right. But that's how it is on nearly every social site on the Internet. Stupid if you ask me. As the Russia girl said:i didnt call you gay i just said your idea was gay, in the sense of "gay" being a joking way for me to tell you that your idea was stupid. doesnt mean i actually think you are gay, nor does it mean that i give a shit
tl,dr he likes to type
Words have changed throughout the decades, that's for sure. Back in my parents day the word gay meant you were happy. But now it means something perverted and ugly.Whats wrong with bein gay? You don't like to be happy tough guy? Not jovial enough for ya? Not too joyous or gleaming for ya?
Words have changed throughout the decades, that's for sure. Back in my parents day the word gay meant you were happy. But now it means something perverted and ugly.
I don't wear no mask. I'm myself wherever I am.You're perverted and ugly.
Nah I'm kiddin I bet you're a pretty swell guy behind the mask.
You're perverted and ugly.
Nah I'm kiddin I bet you're a pretty swell guy behind the mask.
Wrong. I'm not self-righteous. I know that true righteous comes from Christ and not from myself. But the atheists says they don't need Christ because they are righteous without God. That is self-righteous. Righteousness without God defines self-righteousness. I do not adhere to such a belief.You're too much of a self righteous cunt.
Facts alone don't win anything unless it's glaringly obvious to everyone as to the correct way to interpret them, and how they're relevant in the context of the debate. You're presenting facts from teachings approximately 1,500 years old, so you're failing by not presenting nor proving your opinion as to how those facts are even somewhat relevant to humankind today. You just assume it automatically follows. It doesn't. It's no different to reading the Bible and then concluding that the world is in disrepute now because women are allowed to speak in church etc. Perhaps you can give us a thread about the most notable passages in the Bible which are disobeyed today, along with all the hand-waving and mental somersaults that Christians apply to them to avoid contradiction.I never lose debates because I'm not an opinionated person. Only opinionated people lose debates. They lose because they enter a debated armed only with their opinion. I do my research very well before debating anyone. Facts win debates...not opinions or emotions. So when I offer up a topic for discussion that means I researched it very well. Islam is not a subject I slack in. I get kicked out of so many forums because that's how fascists can feel like they won the debate.