Guardian of Darkness said:A common misconception is that 'neo-classical' means bands who enjoy masturbating their guitars, i.e. Dream Theater. What it actually means is when the composition is influenced by classical form but incorporated into modern styles. Stuff like The Chasm, Summoning and Miasma.
Int said:GoD is correct.
Obviously the old Yngwie is one of the best. I am sure you are familiar with his work though.thecrimsonchin said:My interest in this sub-genre has grown more and more since the metal vs. classical thread. Could any of you make some recommendations?
Terminus Est said:One word:
Hollenthon.
Yes, Hollen-fucking-thon!
Really great stuff unless you already know them of course.
A common misconception is that 'neo-classical' means bands who enjoy masturbating their guitars, i.e. Dream Theater. What it actually means is when the composition is influenced by classical form but incorporated into modern styles. Stuff like The Chasm, Summoning and Miasma.
The term neoclassical was originally coined to represent Debussy, Stravinsky, and members of the Second Viennese School.Well, that's one method of describing neoclassicism in music, though certainly not the sole, precise definition. Generally, it's a loose term that indicates "of, relating to, or constituting a revival or adaptation of classical elements." This can be applied thematically, such as in the lyrical content of a composition, structurally, such as in the integration of classical structures such as the sonnet, rondo, minuet, etc. into modern music (which is what I suspect you were implying), or simply even in the utilization of classically-reminiscent complex elements (in this case, the neoclassical element would be present to a much lesser extent, but nonetheless present).
And probably a more accurate term anyway.Guardian of Darkness said:The term "neotraditional" is an alternative.