serious questions(john bush)

metallicasucksponypenis said:
im really disappointed with you dudes. here in ohio, there is quite an overwhelming conservative attitude.... as if to say "if i dont like it, it should be banned"

freedom shouldnt have limits. what a moronic statement. move to afghanistan if you believe that shit.

I definately don't LIKE it, it does nothing for me whatsoever but agree with you that it's ridiculous to have these morale discussions on this messageboard. maybe I'll be proved wrong and Scott and Charlie will choke on their honey roasted ham and cheese sandwiches in horror when they next check the forum and demand the removal of this very lucky dogs snapshot. On the other hand they might just smile like me.. :dopey:
 
metallicasucksponypenis said:
so has john bush done any interviews since this? and you know damn well its all about money. remember them talking shit about joey and saying how much better john is(which is true) way to contradict yourselves, dudes.

oh well. all im asking for a recent john bush interview where he talks about the reunion. is that too much to ask for?

and whats he doing for money in the meantime? do you think he has enough cash saved up from anthrax to where he can take 2 years off? i kinda doubt it, especially because kids are expensive.

Save your breath, friends. This message is postmortem. The author has passed away somewhere in Oregon (or was it Washington?). He took his love to animals too far (literally)...
 
I don´t have a problem with your avatar!
sooo...1) no he hasn´t done any interview yet 2) it was supposed to be all about money 3) he´s playing with Armored Saint somewhere in Arizona in 3 days, 4) he probably doesn´t have enough cash but it wasn´t his fault that he got fired. 5) Yes, kids are quite expensive.
 
Dudes

If you don't like metallicasucksponypenis's avatar then just don't fucking look at it.

I think it's sick and fucked up but I'm not whining about it I'm just not looking at it and the picture isn't exactly big enough that it's in your face.

Just chill out for fucks sake
 
johnnieCzech said:
I don´t have a problem with your avatar!
sooo...1) no he hasn´t done any interview yet 2) it was supposed to be all about money 3) he´s playing with Armored Saint somewhere in Arizona in 3 days, 4) he probably doesn´t have enough cash but it wasn´t his fault that he got fired. 5) Yes, kids are quite expensive.
Careful there. He didn't get fired.
 
metallicasucksponypenis said:
im really disappointed with you dudes. here in ohio, there is quite an overwhelming conservative attitude.... as if to say "if i dont like it, it should be banned"

freedom shouldnt have limits. what a moronic statement. move to afghanistan if you believe that shit.

Being appalled by a picture of a woman sucking a dog's dick is not a liberal v. conservative issue. I'm a libertarian and I find it quite stupid above anything else. Just because several people here have some standard of decency doesn't mean we're trying to censor you. (And perhaps it would be approrpriate to ban this as this board has had children as young as 14 post on it. I'd leave that to the forum owners.)

It's rather stupid to suggest people who don't like your icon believe in the principle that "If i dont like it, it should be banned" (sic). Is there something wrong with actually expressing their dislike of something? Must everyone approve of everything you do or else be cast a censorship advocate?

Furthermore, on a privately owned and operated message board, whatever the owners of the board and its administrators say, goes. That's what freedom is all about: picking with whom one associates.

You're right, freedom should not have limits. (Unless we're talking about things like kiddy porn, statutory rape, etc.) That includes the freedom to call out people for acting like idiots.
 
jdelpi said:
Being appalled by a picture of a woman sucking a dog's dick is not a liberal v. conservative issue. I'm a libertarian and I find it quite stupid above anything else. Just because several people here have some standard of decency doesn't mean we're trying to censor you. (And perhaps it would be approrpriate to ban this as this board has had children as young as 14 post on it. I'd leave that to the forum owners.)

It's rather stupid to suggest people who don't like your icon believe in the principle that "If i dont like it, it should be banned" (sic). Is there something wrong with actually expressing their dislike of something? Must everyone approve of everything you do or else be cast a censorship advocate?

Furthermore, on a privately owned and operated message board, whatever the owners of the board and its administrators say, goes. That's what freedom is all about: picking with whom one associates.

You're right, freedom should not have limits. (Unless we're talking about things like kiddy porn, statutory rape, etc.) That includes the freedom to call out people for acting like idiots.


good point. now what about john bush?????????