Originally posted by redblueyes
I like slow if it's beautiful, not suicidal, or suicidal-slow.
So is Shape of Despair - awesome or super slow? It can't be both! (Can it???)
Jesse, help me. I can't spare $11 if I'm not gonna love it!
Pick me out ONE cd I should get as I haven't checked out anything new lately.
Unfortunately, it is both very slow, very beautiful AND it is in some etherial-way, suicidal. I would not compare SoD to Skepticism in any way, except the speed aspect.. both are very slow.
But here's perhaps a happy medium, go to my personal page @
www.magentaskycode.com -- I currently have a full song of 'Angels of Distress' up. If you like that song, you will like Shape of Despair. If you don't like it, you won't like Shape of Despair. Just please allow the full song to play (it's long) and be patient. Crank the stereo, hit play, and lay on your bed.. I can't imagine it not deeply effecting anyone who gives it an honest chance. It is the OPPOSITE of the 'attention-deficit-disorder' metal with pointless notes every half a second..
It's too bad so many people have these negative feelings towards doom and slow music/metal, because there is a large range of incredible music in this category. I'd admit that Shape of Despair is the slowest band that I _deeply_ enjoy though.
As far as spending $11, well, I think the new Anathema (both new album and 'Resonance' best of) is killer.. I also loved the new Evergrey.. and I'm not much into that style, but that album is really a 'classic' sort of feel..
.