thisisaformicatable
New Metal Member
- Mar 30, 2007
- 666
- 0
- 0
I see no need to "back up" basic findings of social science that have been established through decades of research.
I think he is arguing that since mental illness is not a solvable problem, or at least a problem that is hard to identify,we should solve what we know we can.
Nec, is there any hard evidence that the school is what makes people do school shootings? I mean, it's obvious that school shootings are caused by mental illness (see Cho) but what about schools seems to cause it? It does appear obvious, but there does seem to be a gap between correlation and causation. It could be that schools are targets just because that is where the unstable people receive the most social contact and abuse, and changing the schools will never change that. I feel a little unsure if my reasoning here so correct me where you think I am wrong.
Which mental illnesses?...it's obvious that school shootings are caused by mental illness...
The wiki article doesn't exactly endorse this theory.I'm pretty sure Cho had some kind of illness, perhaps autism.
Social anxiety = "fucked up kid"? The Wiki article tells the story of a kid with social anxiety issues that were exacerbated by the school system.He was definitely a fucked up kid before he entered school.
I really find your approach sad. We will solve this issue by understanding the individuals and the situation, not be demonizing and name-calling. You have to assume people act rationally at all times if you want to determine the factors that affect their actions.Pissed off sane people find constructive ways to deal with their problems, by the way.
It's going to be closed soon anyway.
This is kind of my point. They spend a majority of their lives in school, and this is where they receive the social contact which is usually the reason cited by the shooters for their actions. I don't think this is a problem with the school system, but with the fact that people are awful to each other, and it is only worse if you are different in some way. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the schools shooters have not written manifestos blaming the structure of the school system. Their anger is pointed towards people who bullied them or in Cho's case the "rich kids".Well I don't know man, these shooters tend to think that the schools might be a major cause of why they shoot schools, I'm just basing this on what they say. Schools are abundantly obvious targets for minors since they spend so much of their lives there.
Social anxiety = "fucked up kid"? The Wiki article tells the story of a kid with social anxiety issues that were exacerbated by the school system.
Social anxiety is an experience of fear, apprehension or worry regarding social situations and being evaluated by others.
I really find your approach sad. We will solve this issue by understanding the individuals and the situation, not be demonizing and name-calling. You have to assume people act rationally at all times if you want to determine the factors that affect their actions.
I'm not sure what you are disagreeing with.Are you fucking kidding me? Social anxiety?
This doesn't cause people to shoot up schools, this causes people like me to try and avoid being put into social situations - to avoid people oneself isn't familiar with - to keep to themselves not to snap and shoot people.
Yet you continue to demonize the deviant. What does this have to do with understanding the situation?I'm glad you didn't understand what I said at all, and forgot that on I think the first page I actually said that we should do what you are implying here; personal understanding will be the only thing which helps people I believe, in these cases.
This is idiotic. How can you saw we'll never know when we have barely tried to find out? Social science has learned a lot; where once people like you dismissed social deviants like (for example) Jim Jones or David Koresh as insane, irrational, etc. we now know a great deal about the factors, both internal and exogenous that led to their actions. I don't see any reason why we can't reach similar understandings in relation to the school shooting phenomena.it seemed like we rather reached a nice conclusion (a multitude of factors causes these things and it can never be conclusively known what causes them and how to prevent them because it depends on individual circumstances)
You don't have much of an imagination. Changing the curriculum would be barely scratching the surface of the changes that could be made.@Nec: Yes, the social element of schools is "part" of the school, but not something directly influenced by how the school is run. You can't get rid of peer pressure; it's human nature. I can understand wanting to fix schools, but I just do not really see how the CURRICULAR (fixable) part of schools can cause these kids to be problematic (or disaffected, if it's a better word ).