Television

infoterror

Member
Apr 17, 2005
1,191
2
38
Television

As our society continues its snowballing ride downhill toward collapsed empire status, some among us become "radicalized," or willing to admit that this branch in humanity's history has been a big error and we need to not "fix" it but replace it with something different at the most basic level of concept. Among Greens and Nationalists this pattern has been most visible. Radicalized people do not necessarily advocate violence, or brutality, but they are past the point of believing that a few elections, laws passed, or corporate boycotts will fix anything.

The inclination one has upon coming to such a realization is to drop everything and go extreme, whether that means stocking up on Barrett M-82s or forcing recycling upon one's neighbors. When one has gone extreme, and notices that few others are following that lead, a period of wondering how everyone can be so blind results. We see the end is near; why don't we mobilize? The frustrated Green or Nationalist activist shakes a head in desperation, and goes home to cool his or her heels with a chilled beer and some mellow television.

Herein is a great problem.

Our society is not controlled by a conspiracy, but by the shared idea that it's OK to live only for individual desires as expressed in material means. Most people believe this is the right way to live, and thus they uphold it, even to the point of enslaving themselves. The largest portion of them cannot help it: they don't have the time or the mental wiring to understand politics. The rest are brainwashed, but again, it's by their own choice.

The average American watches four hours of television each day. During that time, they see at least 20 commercials, and take in 3.5 hours of programming designed by people who make their money in product placement. The job of a television program is both to interest people, and to tie itself to lucrative promotions deals; this is why in your favorite sitcoms, characters often have preferences for certain corporate brands or products. They don't mention them - that would be obvious - but how easy it is to be using, or holding, the product during a key scene or funny line.

The same is true of our movies, and of what is best called "news-entertainment," which was actually news in healthier days. Out go the corporate press releases; coincidentally, many of these corporations are responsible for lots of the advertising and copromotions that keep Hollywood and the news-entertainment media alive. It's not rocket science to realize that when the kids in "E.T." eat Reese's pieces, money changed hands between Hershey's and Universal Studios. Or that all those soft drinks and beers in the movie had a paid sponsor, too.

Some time ago, there was a hubbub over government influence on television shows and movies; apparently, scripts were sent on to Washington for oversight regarding important issues like drug use, racism, sexism, poverty, etc. While we all know that military movies are screened and edited by the Pentagon in exchange for military cooperation, that government as a whole would ask to insert propaganda in movies and television is shock to some people. But should it be?

Television and movies are a business; the only rule in business is to make money. In that view, government is just another advertiser, and if one can get preferential treatment for making sure that government-approved ideas are in your work, it's a financially smart move to do so. Furthermore, no business has any obligation to tell you the truth - they make money from keeping you interested, so you notice ads and project placement.

With this in mind, it's impossible - in my view - for any sane person to own a television or watch it regularly. You are voluntarily sitting still while government and industry pour their opinions into your head under the guise of "entertainment," which to me is a condescending word implying that you cannot keep yourself busy. Because the nimwit friends and family members around you are not thinking critically, they believe they cannot exist with television, and you join in to be one of the group.

That so many extremist activists even consider this course of action is mindboggling. Cheaper, more legal and more effective than a shooting spree or vandalizing SUVs is to simply disconnect the propaganda device: don't watch TV. In fact, if every Nationalist and Green activist stopped watching TV tomorrow, the result would be more effective than a hundred thousand marches or protests. It would literally hit industry at the only level it respects, which is money.

Each moment you spend watching TV is one in which you rent your brain to the dogma of your enemies. If you let your children grow up around it, thinking it's acceptable to watch TV, do not be surprised when they adopt attitudes from their electronic babysitter. It's not like they'll miss out; our society is so broken that most people socialize by discussing entertainment, thus they'll hear about all of it anyway.

Television is a passive action, like metrosexuality or multiculturalism. It puts you on your butt and has you submit to the ideas of others, which flow into your brain in unguarded moments when you expect to laugh or be distracted, when in fact subtle cues are working their way into your opinions. It is a low-tech form of mind control, although "mind influence" would be more accurate. But if that influence occurs for four hours every day, how can it not be in whole or part absorbed?

Radicalized political people talk to me every day, and so few of them have thought of this that it's alarming, as if the parasite is already too deeply entrenched. If you turn off your TV, you're truly thinking outside the box. Any kind of radical act you can imagine is, for now, secondary to disconnecting from the flow of lies. If you turn off your TV, those who respect you will be closer to doing the same. Each person who switches off the box deprives those who oppose you of another propaganda outlet.

Oh, people will whine at first - but that should encourage you. Anything they're afraid to do, without good reason, is part of the illusion that our society is something OK. If you're willing to radicalize, you deny that our society is OK, and thus you should act accordingly. People used to try to rebel by listening to weird music, eating weird things, and taking drugs, but now we are slowly realizing that the same people who profit from those things are the ones against which we are ostensibly rebelling.

(And you might whine at first, too, about all the great programs and movies you're missing. If you go to theatres, you can carefully pick which movies you see, and do it infrequently enough to avoid losing hours of every day on "entertainment." If you avoid TV, you get four more free hours a day to work on yourself, start a business, or act politically against those things you see as destructive. How can you afford to keep wasting time on TV and movies, with your only worry being that you personally might miss out on some distractions? Grow up!)

In fact, there is no way to rebel, or to strike a blow with socially-acceptable means, as long as you attempt to do it within the sphere of entertainment products; your enemies own all of the means of production there, and will sell you any type of protest entertainment you'd like, while quietly inserting their own opinions into it. Each time you watch, they gain influence over your mind. The only rebellion is to step outside of the media altogether.

Since the means of rebellion, like the means of production, are controlled by those for whom money obscures all other goals, your only recourse is to head the opposite direction. The true revolutionary in these times does not watch television, does not listen to major label music, and refuses to read news-entertainment media. They know it's a big farce and show designed to distract and brainwash.

Instead, they read books and listen to classical music. When they do that, they're not only off-radar, but counteracting the negative influence of a "culture" manufactured by industry and government to control us all. This is why you turn off your television: you recognize that this mainstream "culture," our corporations and governments, and most people are motivated by the same illusion, and that illusion is responsible for everyhing you despise. Strike back at no cost to yourself - turn off the TV and never turn it on again.

June 28, 2005

http://www.anus.com/zine/articles/television/
 
Well all in all I tend to agree with you. I find it hard to believe that the majority of Greens you have talked to have never thought of- let alone actually acted upon- abandoning TV. I know tons of people who never watch TV or only watch it about once a month when something is of perticular interest is on, and most of these people don't even hold that extreme of political outlooks.

I agree that the entire nature of TV is to try and sell you products. Not just the comericals, but the majority of shows. Its amazing when you stop wacthing TV, then start again, you notice an onslaught of blantent propaganda and social messages you never even noticed before. The less one watches TV the more cleansed their mind becomes and the more free they tend to be of social pressures, such as keeping the perfect image or perfect wieght.

That being said I still do watch TV from time to time. For the most part I only watch sports, so I go months without ever turning on the TV on my own vollition, but then will watch three football games in a row on Sundays in September. I feel the long breaks and the irregularity of my television watching allows me to keep perspective on what I'm being presented with.

Movies I think are different story. A movie done properly, which elimtates at least 95% of Hollywood movies, is truly an artform just as respectable (though for me personally not as preferable) to music or literature. One can present a great deal of questions, answers and ideas in the format of film, so I really wouldn't catagorize it with television.
 
Your first few paragraphs are excellent. However, if one is a green or radical, I dont think turning off the T.V. is a viable form of protest. In fact, one would imagine the radical would be smart enough to be totally unaffected by the marketing and product brainwashing of T.V. Thus this is yet another pointless form of protest as how does one induce everyone else to turn off their T.V.s?

If the quality continues to slip, I think more and more intelligent people will watch only a handful of shows. As a kid I watched alot of tv, but now, I only watch Tv late at night, movies, and a handful of quality shows (Rescue Me, Nip Tuck, Lost, Arrested Development and the Simpsons, thats about it).
 
I will say MTV, VH1, and TV News stations embody American culture.

MTV's programming is obsessed with silly reality shows, where everyone looks the same, acts the same, has little intelligence other than how to dress cute and put down other people. VH1 has become so bad its almost funny. D level celebrities jealously comment on the lives of vapid A level celebrities. The Tv news is the worst of the three. NEws is edited and presented for third graders, inconsequential stories are sensationalized for a week at a time, and unsubstantiated ideological opinions rather than actual facts are the lingua franca of the day.

Really the only thing one can do, is sit back with a beer and laugh.
 
Now that "Lost" is over for the season, I watch about three minutes of TV a day. Basically, if I pass the TV and it's on I'll glance at it, but it rarely interests me. There are so many things I'd rather be doing with my time than watching canned samples of pop culture that someone has decided should appeal to people of my age demographic. I'd rather read a book, write, draw, listen to music--you name it. I'm thoroughly disgusted by the predominance of so-called "reality" TV shows as opposed to anything informative/well-thought-out/maybe even containing something vaguely akin to a plot.

The irony of it all is that watching excessive amounts of TV, though not a good thing, is practically expected of people in my age group, and my parents see my lack of interest in it as yet another indicator that I'm not normal.
 
I like Adult Swim.
Also people in the US should get their news from the BBC or Reuters.com. US networks are crap.
 
this has to be the first anus.com article i agree with.

i despise television and have not watched it at all in some 2 or 3 years. by my definition, i mean i have not watched any show start to finish (30 min or more) in this time. that includes news, shows, weather, whatever else they show in between commercials. if i want information, the internet is a far more receptive source and commercial-free.
 
All I've watched in recent times are some documentaries on Atheism, two entire series of Arrested Development and a lot of Wimbledon. It's only taken up a small proportion of my time. The great majority of TV is completely and utterly worthless - with that I agree.
 
Silent Song said:
i despise television and have not watched it at all in some 2 or 3 years.

You know, here we've found something on which we fully agree. TV is a brain reducer.
 
I find it funny how a lot of people found themselves forced to defend themselves in this thread "NO,I`D NEVER WATCH TV!!! (except lost and sports oh and...)"

I do watch TV,I watch everything I want to and only believe the things I find to be compatible with common sense.The things that interest me are boxing,kickboxing,culture/art shows("documentaries") and the occasional comedy series.They never show any good movies here though.
 
Yeah i agree, i rarely watch television anymore, pretty much sunday night animation domination, and when commercials do come on, i either change it to the weather network to see what the weather might be like or just mute them and leave the room. I will watch shows like Daily planet on the discovery channel, and Connan O'Brien. But at least i consciously know what commercials are trying to do, and i make fun of them when they are on.
 
i wanted to watch the historic reunion Pink Floyd concert for Live8. the channel aired "Money" only, and cut off the ending. thus again my hatred for television is confirmed.
 
Excellent article. I, myself, barely ever watch TV (although I watched Iron Maiden live on state-owned television yesterday -- holy shit, major label music on the propaganda device! :p) and when I move to my new apartment in August I'm not going to get a TV at all; there's nothing on that interests me, and I'm deeply aware of the fact that it rots your mind and eats up so much time that could be used for more productive/satisfactory things.

What the article doesn't really touch upon is WHY people in general watch so much TV. In the most extreme, sad, and pretty common case, deep down people don't really care much for what they're watching -- the important thing is that they are doing SOMETHING that occupies the mind without requiring much of the viewer. This is painfully obvious sometimes when people complain that there's nothing on and while complaining, still lie around, beer in hand, and watch the fucking thing!

TV is a passive distraction, that occupies a large part of the brain via vision, sound etc without actually needing much thought or active participation in return. This is great for the people who toil on and on in some excruciatingly unfulfilling and boring office or factory job during the days, as in some part of their brain they're aware that what they're doing is pointless, unfulfilling, trivial, futile, but as long as they have TV or other mindless entertainment to keep their mind's entropy & chaos at bay they can live on the way they do.

I tend to think TV is a very large part of what sustains this fundamentally flawed society. It is what makes people accept their pitiful existences working away their lives for the benefit or others, by filling their minds with useless drivel, keeping the things that matter suppressed. If the world's TV networks were all magically disabled today, so many strange and wonderful things would have happened by next week.