Television

Jews, Christians don't run this world.

Money does, and degeneracy, which overlaps somewhat with those two religions.

We dont' have enough time to fuck around.

We have to go for the source, and crush it, to save our asses.

DEATH TO THE UNDERMEN
 
infoterror said:
Jews, Christians don't run this world.

Money does, and degeneracy, which overlaps somewhat with those two religions.

We dont' have enough time to fuck around.

We have to go for the source, and crush it, to save our asses.

DEATH TO THE UNDERMEN

The undermen, I take it, are the herd - those not of noble character. They can't be done away with; they've got to be the drudges.

The internet isn't all bad. I like browsing that plato-stanford site with thorough expositions on philosopers and philosophical subjects. Hopefully, someone pens a Levinas entry soon. Obviously, I also use it to fuck around or agitate the normals sometimes.
 
Demiurge said:
The undermen, I take it, are the herd - those not of noble character. They can't be done away with; they've got to be the drudges.

1) We don't need druges.
2) They can never have any political power, yet now, they do.

DEATH TO THE LESSER

3) Each generation will produce failures. If you don't kill them, they will grab power over time.

DEATH TO THE UNDERMEN
 
infoterror said:
1) We don't need druges.
2) They can never have any political power, yet now, they do.

DEATH TO THE LESSER

3) Each generation will produce failures. If you don't kill them, they will grab power over time.

DEATH TO THE UNDERMEN

Haha, but the undermen have all the power! Power and riches seem to escape from the virtuous and noble. hence, how will the virtuous kill the undermen? With virtuous deeds and words? Supposedly the afterlife sorts all of this out, and places them in their proper place of eternal punishment. But I am not so sure. Perhaps these undermen rule in the afterlife as well.
 
if you kill the weakest of 10 men, 9 remain. shortly you will grow to find fault in the weakest of the 9, and kill him too. 8 remain. the weakest of the 8 you can no longer tolerate because he is the weakest link, so you kill that one too. now 7 remain...

do you see the flaw with destroying the weakest among you? it will not end until there is only 1 left, and if it is not you, then you are already dead.

personally i advocate strengthening the weakest, so that you have 10 strong, then 11, and then 12.
 
if you kill the weakest of 10 men, 9 remain. shortly you will grow to find fault in the weakest of the 9, and kill him too. 8 remain. the weakest of the 8 you can no longer tolerate because he is the weakest link, so you kill that one too. now 7 remain...

Your premises are erroneous.

(As also Spartans already count for historical counter-argument.)
 
I rarely watch TV, only the occasional movie with my family. I don't agree with the internet comparison though, because the internet is so versatile, you can do almost anything with it, and I would have never found out about media brainwashing and underground bands if it wasn't for the internet. It is also a great learning tool. Free porn is also pretty cool.
 
I've found that ever since I got this behemoth 61" wide-screen that I watch more televison than before, unfortunately. When I still had the 26" color, I rarely tuned in.

This thing just sucks you in, and it takes real discipline to flick it off. I love watching sports.....but then you end up watching one game after another.....you end up looking at your day and it's gone!

I think home theatre has made us prisoners in our own homes. And if the Studios get there way, it may just get worse.

Has anyone heard that plans are in development to release some films at the cinemas, on DVD, and through Pay-Per-View.....all on the same release date? Saves on overall disrtibution costs as well as advertising. Because when you think that a distributor has to make double the take just to break even (half automatically goes to the Theatre chain).....they might as well make their money now while they have the chance.....while interest is high, and the iron is hot. Because to release the DVD, you have to advertise a second time (that costs money).....and it may get lost in the shuffle.

So, the idea is to maximize profits.....get your expenses out of the way.....and then give the customer the choice. In the end, I think people will go for it. Because the sales of home theatre packages and home video games are a multi-billion dollar industry. There's the proof.....especially over here in North America.
 
It was an excellent post Infoterror. It is impressive the way people on this forum are so anti-television. Television - to use a cliche - is the opiate of the masses.
Every time someone gets rid of their TV they are encouraging others who know them to do the same.
 
I agree completely with the original article...but if I find a show that I enjoy, I'll just download the episodes off the internet, or buy the DVD of it.
 
I like some television. I have watched some wildy entertainting things on TV, both intellectually and just plain old entertainment. The key, for me anyways, is to watch tv in total moderation. I watch maybe 3-4 hours a week at an absolute maximum, and refuse to have anymore than one TV in the house.

The idiot box culture of familes eating and living around a televsion does need to stop, but I dont think tv should be totally disregarded as being useless.
 
Back in University, I was an avid TV watcher ... I remember one of my profs going on that she doesn't watch Television ..and I was like, "Wah??". I honestly chuckled a little. A few years after that, due to lack of time etc, I stopped watching Television and when I went back a year or so later, I found I couldn't stand it. It was so fluffy, so empty and felt so "unreal" that I had to step aside and just consider what kind of hold TV had had on me in the past .. I was completely blind of how terrible it was.

The odd show is great however, but in general, I can't watch Television anymore for any great length of time .. it just, bothers me for some reason. I do however watch a lot of movies, which I find much more believeable and enjoyable.
 
infoterror said:
Jews, Christians don't run this world.

Money does, and degeneracy, which overlaps somewhat with those two religions.

We dont' have enough time to fuck around.

We have to go for the source, and crush it, to save our asses.

DEATH TO THE UNDERMEN

Don't Jews believe they should run the world, as they are God's chosen people? They strongly believe they should not outmarry with goyim. Goyim are encouraged to race-mix. Rabbis are supposed to have the most children, to upgrade their race (which has the highest IQ as a result).

Jews appear to be the chief advocants of political correctness. Because of political correctness and the attitude that the weakest people should be fed and protected (have most children) and the most intelligent should devote themselves to careers, material goods, and foreign holidays (no children) we have negative eugenics.
Rather than being so brutal as to kill the weak, stopping the negative eugenics would be a good idea.
Nothing I have said is hatred against Jews, but I don't think they push political correctness in Israel the way they do elsewhere.
Perhaps it is unsurprising that the people with the highest IQs run things, and it is silly to call it a conspiracy when it is out in the open. It is also natural that Jews will promote Jews.
Fear of pogroms is best avoided by controlling any potentially threatening countries.
 
I was going to post my thoughts on this subject but Judas69 already said EXACTLY what I was going to say .... that's strange . o_O
 
Norsemaiden said:
Because of political correctness and the attitude that the weakest people should be fed and protected (have most children) and the most intelligent should devote themselves to careers, material goods, and foreign holidays (no children) we have negative eugenics.

Individualistic materialism is the origin, it seems to me, of most of these woes: it is the polar opposite of transcendental idealism, which is the original European philosophy. Idealists believe in something more than the self and its desires; materialists do not.

Judaism is a philosophically "materialist" faith, and in its secular form, liberalism, it easily leads to all the things you describe.