The metal and prog worlds are fusing

J. said:
Of course, because it is truly a progressive album (as in "pushing forward") and not stupid wank-metal. Not to mention the entire album is superbly written, original, and cohesive.

haven't heard that but it sums up my idea on thos whole prog /metal thing
the term progressive rock (imo) was coined in the 60's to describe the bands that were pushing the barriers, experimenting and being generally inventive
like pink floyd, zappa and the mothers, tangerine dream etc

its really easy to tag the term prog onto any old complcated wank with long songs, but its more of a reference to the past and therefore can't really be deemed progressive, it has to be about doing something new or pushing the boundaries considerably

celtic frost's, into the pandemonium , voivod's demension hatross
these are albums that pushed music forwards

heres a good quote from wikipeda

"Avant-garde in French means front guard, advance guard, or vanguard. People often use the term to refer to people or works that are novel or experimental, particularly with respect to art, culture, and politics. An enormous part of Avant-garde is the Russian avant-garde.

Avant-garde pushes the boundaries of what is accepted as the norm within definitions of art/culture/reality. An avant-garde mentality believes things arise only from the leading edge of reality."


also stole this, which explains my ramble better i think

"It should be noted that the term "progressive" in the early 1970s had been coined to emphasize the newness of these bands, but by the 1980s the term had become the name of a specific musical style. As a result, bands such as King Crimson which continued to update their sound were not always called "progressive", while some newer self-described "prog" bands purchased vintage mellotrons in order to recreate the sound of early 1970s prog. Fans and hostile critics alike had established "progressive rock" as the permanent name of this genre, and so the connection to the usual meaning of "progressive" became irrelevant."

I guess thats why I'd rather use the terms avante garde or progressive rather than 'prog' because its become a contradiction in real terms
 
and you must get
Aphrodities Child. 666 album
h666.jpg
 
Yeah, that's why Kayo Dot is the best progressive band existing today... even though they don't have moving basslines, keyboards, a thousand time signatures, etc.

"Avant-garde" = the new "prog"
 
Dick Sirloin said:
Yeah, that's why Kayo Dot is the best progressive band existing today... even though they don't have moving basslines, keyboards, a thousand time signatures, etc.

"Avant-garde" = the new "prog"

well I haven't heard enough kayo dot to think about that.
but yes it matters not a jot how many notes you can play
 
unhinged said:
and you must get
Aphrodities Child. 666 album
h666.jpg
I think I need to get this.

And I agree with Kayo Dot being the most truly progressive band of the moment. Or at least the most progressive that I've bothered to pay attention to.
 
Dick Sirloin said:
OK, some questions then:


- Does this mean that we will start seeing a fuckton more bands that claim to play "prog black metal" and such but really just sound like ripoffs of Vintersorg? And will it be worth it if 3% are actually good?

According to Jay at least, it's already happening...

- Can the worlds of prog rock and extreme metal successfully fuse? Is it still at "experimental" stage at this point, or have Enslaved and Opeth set the standard?

I think there's still room for advancement, though the precendents set by bands like Enslaved may make further attempts at adding prog to extreme metal seem less innovative in comparison...in post-rock currently, there are some bands that aren't exactly original (Mono, The Evpatoria Report, Explosions) yet rival anything coming before them...something similar could happen here.

- Will this be the new "trend" in metal? Has Opeth set the stage for a larger breakthrough?

The comments made earlier in this thread point out that this isn't a new development, but as far as being a dominant trend in metal, it's nowhere near as saturated and/or exhausted as some people think...and no offense Ben, but that punk analogy is bullshit. And while Akerfeldt definitely deserves credit, his namedropping is no guarantee that the fanboys will evolve into serious progheads.

- Did progressive rock ALWAYS have close ties to metal? (see Rick Wakeman's involvement with Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin's dabbling in both genres, and the heaviness of songs like Jethro Tull's "Minstrel in the Gallery," King Crimson's "In the Court of the Crimson King", Genesis' "Dancing With the Moonlit Knight" and "The Knife", etc.)?

The two were never incompatible, except to purists of course.

- Is part of the metal aesthetic simply and fundamentally similar to the prog aesthetic (i.e. long songs, virtuosic instrumentation, epic feel, etc.)? A better way to phrase this question would be: is "Rime of the Ancient Mariner" just "The Gates of Delerium" one dimension over?

Those characteristsics are common (but not a requirement, or even the norm) to both, but the presentation is often entirely different, and besides the length there are no non-superficial resemblances between the two songs you use as examples. That said, if there weren't musicians who did see parallels between the two and are equally influenced by both, we wouldn't be having this discussion...

Answer in 1400 words or less.

1char
 
Nice points, Demonspell. And yes, the comparison between Yes and Iron Maiden was mostly arbitrary.