It's probably not a surprise, but I have issues with that position. There isn't any true "host culture." There's only the culture that established itself and declared itself lord of these lands. Blood and soil, good sir.
The "ghettoization" of a culture isn't an objective phenomenon, it's only observable from the perspective of the population that currently holds hegemonic sway.
Even though Beggs identifies as male, the wrestler must compete against girls because of a UIL rule that requires student-athletes to compete by the gender listed on their birth certificates
A north Texas transgender high school wrestler, transitioning from female to male, won a girls’ regional championship when the female opponent forfeited the match over the weekend.
oh, because Texas is stupid and already legislated it for no legitimate reason
Yes, and they're the host of the house the guests are moving into. You don't get to violently riot in someone else's house because that host allows mockery of Islam via cartoons in their house.
Strange position. When you have entire communities that speak a different language from it's host country, barely interacts with the native people of said host, police their own community extrajudicially, and so on, that's an objective ghettoisation.
Well, in many cases they're documented, meaning they aren't guests--they're legal residents. So the more proper analogy would be a father posting humiliating photos of his kids on the fridge, and the children tearing them down and throwing food around the kitchen.
Perceiving it as ghettoization seems, to me, to insinuate that there is a fundamental and stable body of citizens that can be isolated and elevated as the "true" occupants of a nation. I think this is an impossible task.
How is that stupid? Biological males should not be fighting biological females.
there are a lot of trans athletes dominating the olympics, eh?Now that is stupid.
he would be competing against men if not for the law. how is the law perfectly fine? and it's literally not scientific sound, a woman taking testosterone, if she wants to or is transitioning, will undoubtebdly be stronger than a woman without. there's literally no logic behind it