https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...-the-waters-for-green-party-bid-for-president
I never thought I'd say I'm considering voting for a pro-wrestler for president, but assuming he knows what state he's in and that injecting lysol is not a good idea, then he's probably the most qualified.
I have a feeling his 9/11 skepticism will get thrown in his face constantly if he actually runs, but that might lead to some interesting shit in and of itself. I've seen him debate a few people over the years and he relies a little too much on his "I served, what did you do?" card for my taste, gets way too emotional and buttrammed at people disagreeing with him.
Nice to see a prog who can tell/will admit Biden's cognitive decline.
Here’s the way I look at it. Biden confuses his sister and wife, forgets what state he’s in, forgets OBAMA’s name, claims he’s running for senate, and can’t remember what comes after “we hold these truths to be self evident...”. On the other hand, Trump thinks wind turbines cause cancer, nuking a hurricane is a thing, and injecting lysol might cure COVID-19. That’s not even getting into the fact that both of them are compulsive lairs, are super lazy, have a long history of screwing over the working class and enabling nepotism, and have faced credible sexual assault allegations. With those sorts of options, I’m open to any 3rd party or independent candidate coming in and calling both of these pieces of trash out, and more importantly, the corrupt system that underlies it. It would be a longshot of Ventura to get on the debate stage, but because of his name ID, personality, and experience with governance, he’d be harder for the media to ignore than the current Green frontrunner Howie Hawkins, who nobody has heard of and will 100% get ignored.
Many progressives have been trying to raise the alarms throughout the primary, but the mainstream media is ignoring what is patently obviously to everyone who isn’t totally partisan.
Raytheon has confirmed those videos have been captured by one of their ATFLIR targeting pods mounted on the fighter jets. They stated that "video images are not definitive proof that the jet pilots were chasing an actual UFO." Steve Cummings, vice president of Technology Development and Execution, stated that "To really be sure, we would need the raw data", "visual displays alone are not the best evidence" and that one way to exclude any anomaly would be to observe "the same target, behaving the same way on multiple sensors."