rms
Active Member
You didn't respond to what I said at all. Sure having one is better than not having one, that says nothing about the actual education represented by the diploma. They are so easy to get you need at least a bachelors to be competitive now if you don't have a tradeskill.
I did not mention actual education and you've made your position quite clear on that and Ein has responded to you in detail in the past. I am referring to only the economic and social gains by having a college degree, which undoubtedly, improve one's standing in life.
It is not more interested in profits than *any* other. Mercantilism is equally interested in profit. Creating a profits vs labor situation is a false dichotomy. Just because business schools adopted a "shareholder first" orthodoxy some decades ago doesn't mean it is the only or best/correct way of doing business.
I disagree. From it's wiki page;
- forbidding colonies to trade with other nations
- banning the export of gold and silver, even for payments;
- forbidding trade to be carried in foreign ships
- restricting domestic consumption through non-tariff barriers to trade.
To your second part, I also think that it's false and historically inaccurate. Private corporations have only improved the benefits to its labor force by either competition or government regulation. A free market system can care about its work force, but only does so when an immigrant labor is not possible nor there isn't a shared interest in keeping poor people poor, which means making poor babies.