I'd rather we just work on not destroying this one tbh.
That's not happening though, unless we have some sort of authoritarian population control. Also part of the nature of capitalism is that it consumes excess resources and produces excess waste.
Capitalism leads to excessive consumption, and relies upon continual growth though (economic rather than population).
Yeah, I agree with all that. I also think we have more chance of replacing capitalism with a saner system/reducing the population than we have of creating a space program capable of transporting a significant portion of the population over interstellar distances. In either case the chance is pretty slim.
Mars is not interstellar to stay on point.
To get off point we don't need to transport a significant portion of humans for interstellar travel just an elite diverse few and perhaps the sperm and eggs of others for further genetic diversity. The elite crew and their children can maintain the ship during travel. Why transport a huge population that would be dead and replaced by the time they get there.
Yeah I think we need to replace capitalism eventually though for a more civil system. How to instill a desire for personal growth in people without monetary gains though? It would have to be based on mutual benefits or authoritarian I imagine.
No, but transporting people to Mars serves no real purpose as maintaining human life there would probably be even more challenging than maintaining it on an apocalypse ravaged earth. Not that I'm against exploring Mars for reasons of expanding scientific knowledge, I just think it serves no practical purpose with regards to your point about the human race being wiped out.
As to transporting an elite diverse few + sperm/eggs, I see no reason at all my taxes should have to pay for that (not that my taxes do go to NASA, but you take my point). If we're talking about billions of people stranded on a dying earth, knowing that some other arseholes are going to survive somewhere else would probably be more of a source of aggravation than a comfort.
Less than it would cost if we all just stay on earth and eventually are wiped out because we were too cheap to explore and research new worlds?
I'm saying they should work on warp drive or some shit
We are working on multiple things simultaneously btw, (including spacecraft engine/fuel alternatives) with a severely limiting budget. Our adjusted budget is less than half of what it was during the moon landing missions.
Thanks Obama!
The NASA budget has been in slow decline ever since like 1968 dude
Anything you replace capitalism with will be worse by definition for basic human rights. This is the communism problem all over again. People have a basic instinct to buy things that improve their life in both objective and subjective ways ("better" house and "tastier" food) and what will you create that facilitates that basic instinct?
If anything it will just be a different version of capitalism.
It possibly won't be long before capitalist space enterprises take the reigns. Space X is on the rise and they're already a major workhorse for NASA.
If that's the case, only the rich will be on that ship instead of the elite, and likely not even the sperm/eggs of the rest of us. Would you prefer that scenario to paying for it through taxes?