I'm curious as to if you didn't like their actual set or didn't bother with them because you didn't like the albums.
I didn't see a single second of their set. Same with Epica. There are bands whose sound or style can win me over in a live setting. However, when I actually dislike a band's music, that doesn't happen.
I see. You and I are two different types of music fans then. I look at music as being a form of entertainment, so I'm not necessarily looking for everyone to break new ground.
We're not so different, you and I...
I don't expect bands to break new ground. If I did, I'd buy two or three discs a year, not 100. However, a band needs some element in their music to draw me in.
If a band is good at what they do and they make good, catchy music, then I like it.
This is where you and I differ on Thunderstone; I don't think they're good at what they do, I don't think they write good songs.
In addition to my comment above, a band doesn't have to be flat out weird to be awarded any type of creativity or merit.
"Wierd" is not an element of music I seek out. As an example, here's my Top 10 from last year...
Nevermore "The Godless Endeavor"
Redemption "The Fullness of Time"
Primordial “The Gathering Wilderness”
Circus Maximus “The 1st Chapter”
Novembers Doom “The Pale Haunt Departure”
Riverside “Second Life Syndrome”
Kamelot “The Black Halo”
Dead Soul Tribe “The Dead Word”
Trivium “Ascendancy”
Grand Magnus “Wolf's Return”
I would say that very few of the artists on that list are breaking new ground and none of them qualify as "wierd". With each of them, it's about one simple thing... how much I enjoy the music.
Zod