If that's totally true, it's fine, but I don't share your optimism.Nufonia said:(a) there are many so-called rabid fanboys of the band that wanted to hear the new album as quickly as possible. No doubt these people have already ordered the thing anyway.
Do you define "wrapped up in figures and sales" as "wondering if we'll ever be able to make albums without paying for a large portion out of our own pockets, and able to devote our full energy to this instead of squeezing it in around our day jobs"?Nufonia said:(b) you should be happy enough people are so eager to hear the music produced. If you're getting wrapped up in figures and sales, I think the point is being missed.
Sonicarnal Artist said:I downloaded 'em.
Chill, guys: They sucked so bad I deleted them pronto.
Way to double up on the art-fagginess.
Steve said:So it's OK to share it with your friends only?
Steve said:The problem is not people getting the music before their copy of the album, but people who download it and never buy a copy. All the "rabid fanboys" most likely post here and get it in some way from here, or already got a copy at the last gig (before the release).
FuSoYa said:I think it's [downloading] totally fine if
1) you like a record and buy it afterward
2) you hate it and never listen to it again
but liking it a lot, listening to it often, and not buying it is just wrong, unfair, and damaging. I might even go so far as to say it's OK if you're broke but you love the CD. I of course would rather have someone listen to it than not at all.
However sometimes people are really proud of how many albums they've gotten for free and the fact that they're 'beating the system', and that's a different story.
It's a complicated issue that I think can really only be resolved by the honor system, at this time. Keep idealism alive, I guess.
Sonicarnal Artist said:Way to double up on the art-fagginess.
Such great words I need to turn them into a graphic to fit them in my signature. Must set aside time to do that.FalseTodd said:Do you define "wrapped up in figures and sales" as "wondering if we'll ever be able to make albums without paying for a large portion out of our own pockets, and able to devote our full energy to this instead of squeezing it in around our day jobs"?
We want the album to sell well, because if doesn't it makes it harder to do the next one. If you want to talk about the ethics of free music, that's one thing, but don't give us crap about being too concerned about money. This band has cost everyone involved ALOT to be involved in.
I'm not going to stop doing this because of the album not selling, or too many people downloading it or whatever, but I would like it to stop being a financial hardship, which it is for every underground band.
Sonicarnal Artist said:Actually, my bad... I deleted the ALBUM, I still have the demos. They're just renamed now as the official release.
Think that'll cause confusion?
Uh oh!
Novembers Paul said:Were these not the same people that were all humble, and "so sorry" when this first happened? Why the attitude now?
Xtokalon said:lol. this is coming from a guy who thinks Satan imagery and references are the shit. grow the fuck up.