What is so terrible about death anyhow?

neal said:
many would argue that 1900 is actually the last year of the century, not the first.
-neal
Oh right, because some people considered Dec 31st 2000 to be the actual eve of the new millenium, right? (Not Dec 31st 1999 - that was more of a computer glitch thing).

So in that case, she could well have existed in three centuries (assuming she was born in 1900). :cool:
 
Either way, 104 is a long time. If I ever live that long I think I'll just become immortal. :loco:
 
JayKeeley said:
So in that case, she could well have existed in three centuries (assuming she was born in 1900). :cool:
well if she was going to be 104 in 2004 im pretty sure that means she was born in 1900. (unless a year somehow disapears from that subtraction...)
-neal