Dark_Silence said:
8 books a year, means a book every month.
well, i stand corrected: obviously too much reading, and too little maths.
i'm joking, obviously, please don't get offended. but it was too good of an opportunity to pass.
after reading all your replies, let me rephrase my ideas slightly - of course i went for shock value with the extremization, but i still believe what i said. taliesin, i think that you are wrong in believing that the interest in promiscuous behavior fades with time: how often do you read about people who have affairs and destroy their families because of them even way past their prime? i think it's about values more than hormones, and i also think you're on the right track in saying that you'll try to love your companion the best you can later in life even if the enchantment fades away (and i hope that it won't).
in general, i tend to buy into ivana's line of thinking more than any of the other proposals.
hiljainen's comment also made me believe that probably it also boils down to how one interpret signals. i don't know her boyfriend, and this is by no means a comment on him personally, but if i was faced with someone who "accepts more easily the fact" [that people at some point may part ways] i would be horrified - for me, it's not something that comes from the moon, but rather something that people decide, and a penchant for believing things are transitory cannot normally lead to decisions such as marrying someone.
finally, fireangel's comment...
fireangel said:
I think your theory above shows just that you are completely annoyed that such a smart women like you, with a grand job, money and good education hasn´t met an equally brilliant guy yet
ah, i wish that the
yet was there in reality. i honestly don't believe it is, and please note that this is not self-pity or some apotropaic mantra. if it didn't happen yet, it's not happening, in all likelihood. after all, there are women who are perfectly alright and they remain single. there are also women who are good-looking, inspiring and successful, and they remain single. i don't know if i can be described as a member of the second category, but there's still the first.