Jind
Grrrr!!! (I'm a bear)
- Mar 7, 2009
- 2,542
- 0
- 36
A very appropriate article for this thread and some of the directions it has taken - published today in Salon. At least read the whole thing before you dismiss the headline.
A particularly apt quote from the story on some topics expressed in this thread:
http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/dawkins_harris_hitchens_new_atheists_flirt_with_islamophobia/
I'll say it again for reference - any belief or non-belief can become extremism - and when you do you've become what you set out to stop.
I find the comment section interesting as well since non-believers defend their "beliefs" and 'idols" even more than the few believers do. Hey - even if the article is biased, it still makes and interesting case study of how even the non-believer can become defensive when they feel attacked. I do think it opportunism that some are taking a certain position if the benefit is greatest by keeping a particular audience riled up. It keeps the books selling after all.
A particularly apt quote from the story on some topics expressed in this thread:
How the New Atheists’ anti-Muslim hate advances their belief that God does not exist is not exactly clear. In this climate of increased anti-Muslim sentiment, it’s a convenient digression, though. They’ve shifted their base and instead of simply trying to convince people that God is a myth, they’ve embraced the monster narrative of the day. That’s not rational or enlightening or “free thinking” or even intelligent. That’s opportunism. If atheism writ large was a tough sell to skeptics, the “New Atheism,” Muslim-bashing atheism, must be like selling Bibles to believers.
http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/dawkins_harris_hitchens_new_atheists_flirt_with_islamophobia/
I'll say it again for reference - any belief or non-belief can become extremism - and when you do you've become what you set out to stop.
I find the comment section interesting as well since non-believers defend their "beliefs" and 'idols" even more than the few believers do. Hey - even if the article is biased, it still makes and interesting case study of how even the non-believer can become defensive when they feel attacked. I do think it opportunism that some are taking a certain position if the benefit is greatest by keeping a particular audience riled up. It keeps the books selling after all.