Speaking of which, what sort of plans do you guys have for a follow up to CoTE at this point?FuSoYa said:I think i'm going to do wayfarer actually... or, a new one if i can finish it up in time/ if I can get people together to record a rough version of it (so doubtful though).
Will you continue to be very light on the riffing and more into dynamics as in CotE or will there be a return to more linear themes in the vein of MotW? I was reading one interview where it was explained that you have no love for 'traditional' metal arrangement (string of riffs) anymore, and that MotW (I think you were still MotW then) would instead focus more on the open-chord dynamics and orchestration that later on indeed defined the sound of your debut as Kayo Dot. This shift was related to a desire to emulate classic composition by someone in the band. But there are quite a few composers (contemporary and classical) that use linear composition and repeated thematic sequences like Mussorgsky or Chopin or even Phillip Glass.no plans for a follow up... probably will be something entirely separate.
I was referring to the sheet music you can produce with the program. According to my music teacher, some professional sheet music companies use the program. The midi sounds you create obviously sound pathetic, but the actual music composed on it can be outstanding.Helm said:Sibelius is one's best bet if they want to do something advanced but it still won't help much. You can only do so much to a shitty sample anyhow.
avi said:Toby Driver, I hate you and your contempt for Cakewalk.
Much love to Static for making this thread brighten my morning.
I think Finale is quite good, for a notation program.FuSoYa said:[....] Additionally, I think they're likely to find interesting a composer's own creative ways of expressing in notation an unusual part; in other words, yeah of course i could notate this stuff, I'm writing it by hand, not using Cakewalk or Finale or something retarded like that.
Furthermore for the effected stuff, believe it or not but they want specs on all the digital or electronic equipment used, so for a certain effected guitar part, I'd have to include the specs R Tap 0.110 ms/ L tap 0.256 ms/ decay 3.267 ms/ gain 0.0 db/ flange 30 % etc etc