You're all fucking gay.

[TwistedSister]

Would you like some A-1 with that?


Yes, that's a baby.

Wtf??!

 

[Dead_Lioness]

^ If you think about it, this picture doesn't really make sense therefor its fake.


The man who is sitting there obviously has a soup bowl and a plate and both empty: so first of all, my guess is, he already ate "his main course"
and it wasn't a rotten baby.
(In many asian cultures: any meal combines a plate that holds the main course, and the bowl is usually full with rice and you eat them together)

The second thing is: if he has a plate and a bowl, he obviously "cultured" enough to eat from dishes, then how come the baby is on the table?
I would assume a rotten baby would be some kind of a "treat" or a special meal you eat only once in a while in a canibal life...
(Cause I don't think the grocery stores out there would carry them in the frizer)
then if its THAT special, I find it odd that its not on some kind of a plate,
or some kind of a tray, a "special" food like that that is obviously
Superstitious or even religious, would have to be on some form of "dish"


The third thing that gets me going is the background and the drawings of
parts behind him... to me it looks like he is in some kind of place that
maybe draw, or investigate or anything with the human parts,
therefor, that baby might be fake and this picture was taken as a joke or something...

 

[LORD_RED_DRAGON]

IF YOU START OFF ASSUMING IT'S FAKE THEN IT'S NOTICIBLE THAT THE PIC'S BEEN PHOTOSHOPPED BUT THE PEOPLE THAT START OFF ASSUMING IT'S REAL GET FOOLED BY THE VERTICLE LINE THAT MAKES IT APPEAR "AUTHENTIC" WHICH CAN EASILY BE EXPLAINED THE ORIGINAL IMAGE WAS PRINTED OUT ON PRINTER PAPER (INSTEAD OF PHOTO PAPER) THE PRINTER PAPER WAS THEN PURPOUSLY WRINKLED IN A WAY THAT MAKES IT LOOK LIKE A FUCKED-UP PHOTO PARER PRINTING THEN RE-SCANNED INTO A COMPUTER (AND POSSIBLY ALTERED ONCE MORE) BEFORE ANY ONE FROM www.rotten.com ACTUALLY SAW IT

 

[DreamNeonBlack]

This has nothing to do with eating babys...

http://theonenetwork.com/movies/Anchorman/4043/Film_Clip_Afternoon_Delight_300.html


It just makes people happy :Spin:

 

[El Stormo]

I sure hope it's fake, Dead_Lioness. Because honestly, I'm not a prissy guy, but posting such pictures, if they're real, is just wrong. Am I seriously the only person who feels this way?

 

[replicated]

I sure hope it's fake, Dead_Lioness. Because honestly, I'm not a prissy guy, but posting such pictures, if they're real, is just wrong. Am I seriously the only person who feels this way?

Yes, you are. Everyone knows eating babies is cool. Even George Bush does it. :hotjump:

 

[El Stormo]

And George Bush is cool?

By the way, that photo of Warrel is pretty creepy

 

[TwistedSister]

I sure hope it's fake, Dead_Lioness. Because honestly, I'm not a prissy guy, but posting such pictures, if they're real, is just wrong. Am I seriously the only person who feels this way?

No you´re not. I´m not sure if it´s real or not, but if it is than it´s probably some of the weirdest shit I´ve ever seen.

 

[Det Som Engang Var]

^ If you think about it, this picture doesn't really make sense therefor its fake.


The man who is sitting there obviously has a soup bowl and a plate and both empty: so first of all, my guess is, he already ate "his main course"
and it wasn't a rotten baby.
(In many asian cultures: any meal combines a plate that holds the main course, and the bowl is usually full with rice and you eat them together)

The second thing is: if he has a plate and a bowl, he obviously "cultured" enough to eat from dishes, then how come the baby is on the table?
I would assume a rotten baby would be some kind of a "treat" or a special meal you eat only once in a while in a canibal life...
(Cause I don't think the grocery stores out there would carry them in the frizer)
then if its THAT special, I find it odd that its not on some kind of a plate,
or some kind of a tray, a "special" food like that that is obviously
Superstitious or even religious, would have to be on some form of "dish"


The third thing that gets me going is the background and the drawings of
parts behind him... to me it looks like he is in some kind of place that
maybe draw, or investigate or anything with the human parts,
therefor, that baby might be fake and this picture was taken as a joke or something...

Whoa, your smart I would never have thought of that.

 

[VickyH]

Erm..am I the only one disturbed by that?
Its just the image that gets me.

no bacchante ... ur definatly not ...

 

[Valerie]

^ If you think about it, this picture doesn't really make sense therefor its fake.


The man who is sitting there obviously has a soup bowl and a plate and both empty: so first of all, my guess is, he already ate "his main course"
and it wasn't a rotten baby.
(In many asian cultures: any meal combines a plate that holds the main course, and the bowl is usually full with rice and you eat them together)

The second thing is: if he has a plate and a bowl, he obviously "cultured" enough to eat from dishes, then how come the baby is on the table?
I would assume a rotten baby would be some kind of a "treat" or a special meal you eat only once in a while in a canibal life...
(Cause I don't think the grocery stores out there would carry them in the frizer)
then if its THAT special, I find it odd that its not on some kind of a plate,
or some kind of a tray, a "special" food like that that is obviously
Superstitious or even religious, would have to be on some form of "dish"


The third thing that gets me going is the background and the drawings of
parts behind him... to me it looks like he is in some kind of place that
maybe draw, or investigate or anything with the human parts,
therefor, that baby might be fake and this picture was taken as a joke or something...

If you look closely the baby is on a dish/tray type thing. And it looks like it's a scanned picture. Go to Rotten.com and look for it, they have more pictures of it.

http://poetry.rotten.com/infantiphagia/

"No meat tastes better than the meat you raise yourself" or something

 

[derek]

I've read a book where a baby eating scene is used to symbolise something, and although i could appreciate what they were getting at, the bullshit attempted shock factor of something so obviously despicable is an immature and idiotic thing to do.

 

[Seasons_Of_Destruction]

 

[Bacchante]

no bacchante ... ur definatly not ...

Thank GOD. I was starting to wonder...

 

[dreaming neon darkspot]

I've read a book where a baby eating scene is used to symbolise something, and although i could appreciate what they were getting at, the bullshit attempted shock factor of something so obviously despicable is an immature and idiotic thing to do.

"A Modest Proposal" by Jonathan Swift, perhaps?
we read that in Brit Lit a while ago and i damn near died laughing.

 

[derek]

No, twas not that. It was Wild Highway, by a certain Mr Bill Drummond.

 

[zakk_hate_me_666]

i thought you called him a twat for a sec, then i saw it was "twas"

i was like ... "woah, a little hostile over literature are we?"

 

[LORD_RED_DRAGON]

TOTALLY SERIOUS QUESTION IS THIS VVV

THE SAME AUTHOR AS THE BOOK WHERE A MAN IS INSTRUCTING YOU HOW TO GIVE A BLOW-JOB???

 

[LORD_RED_DRAGON]

"A Modest Proposal" by Jonathan Swift, perhaps?
we read that in Brit Lit a while ago and i damn near died laughing.

YEAH IT WAS TOTALLY HILLARIOUS BUT THE BOOK FINAL PRODUCT WAS READING WAS A TOTALLY SERIOUS BOOK

 

[LORD_RED_DRAGON]

And George Bush is cool?

GEORGE BUSH SUX