I get so annyoned sometimes, studying old English literature at university as we discuss the underlying meanings, metaphores etc etc in the texts. We assume that the writers had such ambitions with their work and that they pondered for months and years about every little thing added in their books. It's so liberating hearing Åkerfeldt defuse the "depth" of his lyrics. Here follows a loose translation of his own words from an interview in Close-Up (Sweden's biggest metal magazine)...
"I feel so stupid when I have to talk about lyrics in interviews. I don't even know myself what they are about...I usually get a picture in my head and then I can write a full verse in 30 seconds. A couple of days later I've totally forgotten that image. I just want to create pleasant lines to sing and then you get a lot of neat words, symbolism and it gets cryptic like hell."
...and still his lyrics rule!!!
"I feel so stupid when I have to talk about lyrics in interviews. I don't even know myself what they are about...I usually get a picture in my head and then I can write a full verse in 30 seconds. A couple of days later I've totally forgotten that image. I just want to create pleasant lines to sing and then you get a lot of neat words, symbolism and it gets cryptic like hell."
...and still his lyrics rule!!!