2016 Presidential Election

All Hillary had to do was make a concession of sorts and allow Sanders in as VP. But noooooooo, she just had to choose Kaine because he did her a favor, so she now owed him a favor.
 
You could have flipped a coin and had almost the same odds of being right. Calm down mister fortune teller. Why not come on down to vegas then?

A. I called it during the primaries, after only 3 Republican primary contests, only 2 of which Trump won, 1 being New Hampshire which was written off as a Yankee win. Calling a Trump win was far, far from 50/50.
B. Voting patterns aren't as simple as a coin flip, even in a General Election.
C. Certain different analyses have to be the correct to predict Sanders performing better, separate from calling a Trump win in the primaries.
D. What does Vegas have to do with anything? Is Nate Silver a regular or something?
 
Ok mister stats genius, why not start 539.com and show the world your infallible methodology, since your correct guess is a clear indicator that you knew better than everyone.
 
Just gonna drop this in here. As a more libertarian leaning person this struck a chord with me why Trump won and how the left is pushing people away. I remain very cautiously optimistic about Trump.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Satanstoenail
Ok mister stats genius, why not start 539.com and show the world your infallible methodology, since your correct guess is a clear indicator that you knew better than everyone.

I never claimed it was generalize-able (or based on stats). And I didn't know better than everyone; Scott Adams was an influence. But I knew that oversampling Democrats and polling the same people (and not new voters) over and over was poor methodology in this election. Which is what was admitted after the fact.
 
I never claimed it was generalize-able (or based on stats). And I didn't know better than everyone; Scott Adams was an influence. But I knew that oversampling Democrats and polling the same people (and not new voters) over and over was poor methodology in this election. Which is what was admitted after the fact.

Wait, who admitted that after the fact? LA Times admitted it up-front and that's why the poll was criticized when it was consistently about +6 for Trump ahead of the rest of the average of national polls. I thought all of the others polled new voters.
 
My reasoning for voting Trump is simple: He stood as a symbol against this ridiculous PC culture, entitled generation of brats, and wasn't kissing the bootheels of every minority under the sun.
 
Wait, who admitted that after the fact? LA Times admitted it up-front and that's why the poll was criticized when it was consistently about +6 for Trump ahead of the rest of the average of national polls. I thought all of the others polled new voters.

I read a lot of pollster apologies the day after, not sure of who said which or both.
 
I had a feeling that this would come up on here lol.

A lot of things happened between my comments and the election though. The FBI/Comey intervention a week before the election, Wikileaks and the email 'scandal', plus a massive planning failure on the part of the Clinton campaign. They didn't mobilize their base enough either and just assumed that the blue belt was theirs and it clearly was up for contention.

Sucks being wrong, and it really sucks to have a bumbling demagogue in the White House, but whatever.
 
Taking the rust belt for granted was a major error, but I don't think the email issue decided the election. From what I recall of the exit polling most people already knew who they would vote for. Even looking at facebook or on here for anecdotal reference, Hillary supporters think it's just a 'scandal' and non-Hillary supporters are livid about the issue for one reason or another.