Lasse, please sticky this to avoid any further debates.
For anyone who wonders about the following productions, here is how they compare, coming from an unbiased source:
Peavey
The 5150 (block letter and signature) and 6505 are all the exact same amplifier when it comes to circuitry, factory bias, and transformers. The ONLY differences between these amplifiers are their external appearance.
On a recent note, the component tolerances for Peavey amplifiers, as well as the production location (China), may effect how the 6505 amps sound compared to 5150 despite them being the exact same circuit.
EDIT: So far, in my experience, I prefer the sound of the newer 6505 amps, but the one I own may be a "winner," whatever that means.
The 5150 combo and 6505 combo are also the exact same amplifier. These are biased slightly hotter than the 5150II head, supposedly sound more "open," and share more in common circuit wise to the 5150II than the 5150.
The 6505+ 1x12 combo supposedly has three resistors different from a 5150/6505 head, but I have yet to verify this information.
The 5150 II and 6505+ are also the exact same amp. These amplifiers have less low end, are brighter, are a slight bit more nasal, and have an adjustable bias compared to their 5150/6505 counterparts. These have several component differences compared to the original heads. They also have one extra preamp tube for the rhythm channel and less gain overall.
(some of this information was taken from this thread; others I have collected from various places on the internet, including this forum, and do not take credit for).
Mesa/Boogie
The Single Rectifier sounds least like the Dual and Triple Rectifiers. It is in most cases considered the weakest and fizziest of the bunch. The circuitry is different from the Dual and Triple Rectifiers.
The Two Channel Dual/Triple Rectifiers and Dual Rectifier Rackmount all have the same circuitry and sound so similar that you can dial them all in to have nearly 100% the same tone. The Dual Rectifier Rackmount sounds most different from it's bretheren because the circuit board is physically smaller and the components are closer together.
The Three Channel Dual/Triple Rectifiers sound exactly the same minus the amount of clean headroom, which may affect the response of the amp to sound slightly more "squishy." The circuitry is supposedly identical.
The 2010 Multi Watt Three Channel Dual/Triple Rectifiers have an improved clean/pushed channel and assignable diode/tube tracking as well as a 50/100/150(where applicable) watt switch for each channel.
The Dual Rectifier Roadster is voiced darker and is slighly tighter than the Three Channel Dual Rectifier.
The Dual Rectifier Road King (I and II) supposedly has identical circuitry to the Three Channel Dual Rectifier, but having more components stuffed on the circuit board will definitely effect the sound ever so slightly.
The Three Channel Dual/Triple Rectifiers are slightly brighter and more aggressive than their Two Channel counterparts. You can dial these amps in to sound almost exactly the same as the Two Channel versions. The biggest differences are noted in the Two Channel versions had transformer and slight circuit revisions in the early numbers.
Supposedly the earliest two channel Dual/Triple Rectifiers from around '92/'93 had circuits that were nearly identical to the Soldano SLO100 give or take values on a few components. These are considered the "Holy Grail" of the Rectifier series. The amps have been voiced less favorably since then according to discriminating Boogie enthusiasts.
The 5150 series also shares much of it's preamp topology and voicing with the Soldano SLO100.
For comparison between 5150 models, check here: http://www.ultimatemetal.com/forum/equipment/577358-5150-5150-ii-5150-iii-tone-comparison-clipz.html
EDIT (Lasse) 2ch Recto Info
For anyone who wonders about the following productions, here is how they compare, coming from an unbiased source:
Peavey
The 5150 (block letter and signature) and 6505 are all the exact same amplifier when it comes to circuitry, factory bias, and transformers. The ONLY differences between these amplifiers are their external appearance.
On a recent note, the component tolerances for Peavey amplifiers, as well as the production location (China), may effect how the 6505 amps sound compared to 5150 despite them being the exact same circuit.
EDIT: So far, in my experience, I prefer the sound of the newer 6505 amps, but the one I own may be a "winner," whatever that means.
The 5150 combo and 6505 combo are also the exact same amplifier. These are biased slightly hotter than the 5150II head, supposedly sound more "open," and share more in common circuit wise to the 5150II than the 5150.
The 6505+ 1x12 combo supposedly has three resistors different from a 5150/6505 head, but I have yet to verify this information.
The 5150 II and 6505+ are also the exact same amp. These amplifiers have less low end, are brighter, are a slight bit more nasal, and have an adjustable bias compared to their 5150/6505 counterparts. These have several component differences compared to the original heads. They also have one extra preamp tube for the rhythm channel and less gain overall.
(some of this information was taken from this thread; others I have collected from various places on the internet, including this forum, and do not take credit for).
Mesa/Boogie
The Single Rectifier sounds least like the Dual and Triple Rectifiers. It is in most cases considered the weakest and fizziest of the bunch. The circuitry is different from the Dual and Triple Rectifiers.
The Two Channel Dual/Triple Rectifiers and Dual Rectifier Rackmount all have the same circuitry and sound so similar that you can dial them all in to have nearly 100% the same tone. The Dual Rectifier Rackmount sounds most different from it's bretheren because the circuit board is physically smaller and the components are closer together.
The Three Channel Dual/Triple Rectifiers sound exactly the same minus the amount of clean headroom, which may affect the response of the amp to sound slightly more "squishy." The circuitry is supposedly identical.
The 2010 Multi Watt Three Channel Dual/Triple Rectifiers have an improved clean/pushed channel and assignable diode/tube tracking as well as a 50/100/150(where applicable) watt switch for each channel.
The Dual Rectifier Roadster is voiced darker and is slighly tighter than the Three Channel Dual Rectifier.
The Dual Rectifier Road King (I and II) supposedly has identical circuitry to the Three Channel Dual Rectifier, but having more components stuffed on the circuit board will definitely effect the sound ever so slightly.
The Three Channel Dual/Triple Rectifiers are slightly brighter and more aggressive than their Two Channel counterparts. You can dial these amps in to sound almost exactly the same as the Two Channel versions. The biggest differences are noted in the Two Channel versions had transformer and slight circuit revisions in the early numbers.
Supposedly the earliest two channel Dual/Triple Rectifiers from around '92/'93 had circuits that were nearly identical to the Soldano SLO100 give or take values on a few components. These are considered the "Holy Grail" of the Rectifier series. The amps have been voiced less favorably since then according to discriminating Boogie enthusiasts.
The 5150 series also shares much of it's preamp topology and voicing with the Soldano SLO100.
For comparison between 5150 models, check here: http://www.ultimatemetal.com/forum/equipment/577358-5150-5150-ii-5150-iii-tone-comparison-clipz.html
EDIT (Lasse) 2ch Recto Info