food tastes good said:that's probably because metal songs are a lot longer and more intricate.
LuminousAether said:AFI's latest has what... 12 tracks? It's also only like 40 minutes. Mardraum from Enslaved has either 11 or 12 (I forget) and a runtime of around 60 minutes. By your retarded criteria, wouldn't that make them a better band?
Who cares how many songs there are and how long they are if they are all well written and the album is over 30 minutes? Any shorter and it's kind of a shame, I prefer around 50 minutes for an album... but regardless, number of riffs and songs doesn't imply greatness in great amounts.
Listener1254 said:reign in blood is 28 minutes. I'm just saying it's easier to write a longer song like a ten minute song than it would be to write two 5 minute songs, that's all. So, the shorter your songs are(around 2-3 mins), and you have tons of them, the harder it is to write them.
LuminousAether said:Reign in Blood sucks too.
food tastes good said:dude, you really gotta calm down with all your punk vs. metal crap.
LuminousAether said:Most punk bands recycle the same idea song after song album after album.
But generally, punk bands don't have any pretenses about being artistic visionaries who are going to reinvent the wheel every time they go into the studio.LuminousAether said:Most punk bands recycle the same idea song after song album after album.