Draehl
Lurker
Dark, heavy at least in parts of songs, and a generally similar vocal style are really the only qualifiers I'd place on the genre. Subject matter is irrelevant.
I still don't buy the argument attributing ideology as an essential tenet of black metal. It seems like a flawed process of identification to me. Of course, because the satanic elements were often done for theatrical purposes, and the medium itself is an art form, that might nullify the issue.
It just seems to me that if ideology can always be redescribed as subject position (i.e. what people believe isn't absolute truth, it's merely the result of their position in the world), then it's useless to try and ascribe ideology as a defining factor of a musical genre. My example would be that the founders of America were deists, but that doesn't mean you have to practice deism in order to be considered American. Then again, I understand that the satanist aspects were often done for performance purposes; but if they're performative anyway, why are they necessary to the genre? The music is the vehicle for the ideology, not the other way around. It seems to me that it doesn't matter whether the satanism is "real" or "fake."
Velvet Cacoon is one of my favorite atmospheric black metal bands. Very oceanic.
Velvet Cacoon is one of my favorite atmospheric black metal bands. Very oceanic.
Velvet Cacoon? No, last I checked they called it quits.
That sounded great. Not what you usually hear.
Altar of Plagues should fit the bill then, right? I'm starting to get into this type of metal as well, and am appreciating the recommendations.Dark, heavy at least in parts of songs, and a generally similar vocal style are really the only qualifiers I'd place on the genre. Subject matter is irrelevant.