please tell me you're joking
if you consider that they in many ways desperately want to be a 1970's progressive rock band, it makes some sense to have a more literary/uppity looking logo. It reeks of fartsniffing bookwormism, but for whatever reason I can appreciate it.
To be fair, I think he's talking about their output post-Watershed.Still Life and Blackwater Park or any of their older stuff are wannabe 70's progressive rock? Did you just start listening to them a few years ago or what?
Anyone who doesn't know well enough to listen to Goblin and Jethro Tull anyway.Who the fuck around here listens to post Watershed Opeth anyway?
Still Life and Blackwater Park or any of their older stuff are wannabe 70's progressive rock? Did you just start listening to them a few years ago or what?
You know, that's actually a pretty good assessment of the band's (d)evolution.I think even in their early days they wanted to be, in spirit, a 1970's progressive rock band. The way they mixed genres was so unorthodox back then. So they better honoured old progressive music by actually being very original. Now they've just dropped all intention of originality and instead dabble in cloneism.
Anyone who doesn't know well enough to listen to Goblin and Jethro Tull anyway.