Black Metal... as art

infoterror

Member
Apr 17, 2005
1,191
2
38
Phenomenal leaps have occurred in the skill level in the black metal genre. Where black metal drummers used to be a source of amusement for anyone past the first handful of percussion lessons, now it is easy to bump into a qualified candidate at any show. The guitar work is precise in ways the founders of the genre could not have imagined, and new degrees of technique in tremelo picking, sweeps and arpeggios dwarfs the old ways.

Even in the simplistic bands great advancements have occurred. The song structures are well-known in all of their variants, and bands now are so proficient in this area they can tell from a single glance what type of song must be built around a riff to complement it. Everything's less awkward; we know the best tempos to carry the audience, and what paces from them we can leap without causing abrupt disconnects. There are ratios for melodic riffs to blasting atonality, codices for when the keyboards come in and percussion layers boil off, tables for the use of dual vocals... black metal is almost a science, now.

Aesthetically, there is much less confusion and far fewer missteps. No band today would put out that awkward video that the Immortal guys did, or screw up like Burzum did and make those very earthy and not very black metal flyers. No self-respecting 2006 black metal band would be caught with the mishmash of gear these guys attempted to use at first, the wrong string guages and pick widths, the wrong amplifiers and pedals, even drumsets all mis-arrayed for the task ahead... no, we've got a much better grip on the craft of black metal, these days.

We've got the whole thing so much farther advanced than the founders of this genre that it's doubtful they'd get a second listen today. Just hearing those sloppy riffs, the un-slick arrangements of keyboard, seeing the awkward band photos and hearing their very-far-from-pro sound, well, they'd probably not make it. We've come so far that we probably don't even need Immortal, Burzum, Gorgoroth, Enslaved, Mayhem, Emperor, Varathron or Bathory; we've got bands that are so much better at what they do.

There is one crucial difference, though -- the recent Summoning CD pointed out beyond doubt that black metal which preserves the epic feeling of past grandeur, and the sense of lawless abandon in the night which frees our souls from the preemptive frustration of morality and profit ethics, could still be written. What was the difference? Summoning don't appear to have varied equipment or technique since 1993 or so. The answer is simple: it's in the composition.

http://www.anus.com/metal/about/metal/art/
 
a very interesting article, and i thank you for it. as much as i love contemporary black metal i still listen to old ‘classics’ — darkthrone’s a blaze in the northern sky, for example, making stupendously excellent late night washing–up music listening. and i cannot get enough of some of burzum’s albums. i think you do a grave disservice to luminaries like emperor by listing them alongside bathory: take a listen to prometheus: the discipline of fire and demise, for example, and tell me you don’t hear technical excellence in that album!

music evolves, obviously. even punk did so. regardless, like punk, black metal doesn’t need to rely on spazzed–out song structures or proficient guitar–playing to achieve a deliciously atmospheric, spine–tingling effect. i happen to enjoy burzum’s drumming; only on his albums, mind you, but still…
 
کوڈانشی said:
regardless, like punk, black metal doesn’t need to rely on spazzed–out song structures or proficient guitar–playing to achieve a deliciously atmospheric, spine–tingling effect.

Seems to be a theme in the article; composition is what defines the music, not the embellishments, which most of those spazzed-out song structures and guitar wankery tend to be - not all.

I like the punk bands that are musical without being wanky.
 
Half of the appeal of early black-metal was the fact that nobody had a grip of anything.

I suppose being half-arsed and n3cro eventually just doesnt cut it.

Anyone heard the helrunar cd? (name escapes me) man I love BM.

:p
 
Black Metal as a whole is what appeals to me... Both the tighter, more technical versions of it (Anthems to The Welkin at Dusk, Isa, Ruun, misc Borknagar albums, Sons of Northern Darkness), and of course the more raw, unpolished incarnations (Det Som Engang Var, Vikingligr Veldi, Frost, Wrath of the Tyrant, the odd Graveland albums here and there, Diabolical Fullmoon Mysticism etc).

As long the as music is "honest" and the philosophy/subject matter is expressed "legitimately", technicality (or lack thereof) is of little importance.

It is the overall composition which provides the foundation of good music, regardles of genre.

infoterror said:
... composition is what defines the music, not the embellishments, which most of those spazzed-out song structures and guitar wankery tend to be ... I like the punk bands that are musical without being wanky.

Agreed, totally.
 
I myself listen to both the original raw black metal (Burzum) and the new more technical black metal (Dimmu Borgir) and I appreiciate both equally. The concept is what matters. I do per say listen to the newer music more often though simply because it is more apealing to the ears at times.
 
just another opinion: with the description of newer BM in the article I associate the words "predictable" and "boring" and that is exactly how I feel when I listen to some of the new BM bands on the internet. The older bands had a style of their own and were more experimental. I don't think they were looking for riffs to please the audience, or to perfect their composing skills. Instead, they were trying to create a certain athmosphere. Maybe that is what separates the old and new BM bands/approaches?
 
Alwin said:
just another opinion: with the description of newer BM in the article I associate the words "predictable" and "boring" and that is exactly how I feel when I listen to some of the new BM bands on the internet. The older bands had a style of their own and were more experimental. I don't think they were looking for riffs to please the audience, or to perfect their composing skills. Instead, they were trying to create a certain athmosphere. Maybe that is what separates the old and new BM bands/approaches?

Which of the newer bands are you referring to though?

Drudkh, Negura Bunget ... Deathspell Omega, and also of note, The Amenta - I certainly can't associate "predictable" and "boring" to these bands.

These bands take elements of first generation black metal and well researched lyrics, they make intelligent Black Metal, don't release album after album, and concentrate o good composition as well as atmosphere.

Mind you - there would be a plethora of bands, good and bad, out there who I have not yet heard, and obviously won't pretend to have.
 
The Hubster said:
Which of the newer bands are you referring to though?

Drudkh, Negura Bunget ... Deathspell Omega, and also of note, The Amenta - I certainly can't associate "predictable" and "boring" to these bands.

These bands take elements of first generation black metal and well researched lyrics, they make intelligent Black Metal, don't release album after album, and concentrate o good composition as well as atmosphere.

Mind you - there would be a plethora of bands, good and bad, out there who I have not yet heard, and obviously won't pretend to have.

yes, you are right, some new bands have the same approach as the older bands. I was referring to the article in the first post where it is suggested that BM is fully developed now and, hence (or maybe this is just my association), there are no big surprises expected anymore. At the same time the article suggests that this is good, since the quality of the music has improved. Since I prefer the experimental and athmospheric approach, I interpret the conclusions of the article as lack of ideas and development rather than the perfection of a style.
 
I don't like that he made it sound like Enslaved, Emperor, Mayhem, etc. was out dated. They still make some of the best black metal out there. (Hopefully Emperor's reunion tour will make them want to do another album.)
 
Vesupria said:
If Black Metal is art that celebrated the magic of the nighttime world, then how would you describe the music of artists such as My Bloody Valentine, Tangerine Dream and Kraftwerk?

Kraftwerk is an attempt to find joy in function, inspiring healthier use of technology.

Tangerine Dream is the music of daydreams when they verge on hallucination.

My Bloody Valentine is pop music about potential, not actualities, with a strong romantic streak.

Good q's, sorry I didn't see 'em earlier
 
Vesupria said:
I'm coming to the conclusion that the best art seems to be about potential (sure it may include brief moments actuality). This is what I call the world of idealism, a time of dreaming where one transcends his existence for a place of hallucination - I think this is what the Romantics were after when they utilized their imaginative qualities. From this 'place' we bring back visions that can be applied to reality. If we were to be vague we may say that this is generally the divide between Death Metal and Black Metal (although one may name exceptions), the former leans on actuality, whilst the latter basks in potential.

It's clearly the divide between punk and metal. Punk = let's focus on tangibles, therefore it's exclusively deconstructionist and has nowhere to go. Metal is about dreams of something better, which is actually more useful than deconstruction, as deconstruction does not posit a future path... it only closes doors in the past.

You're definitely describing a transcendental outlook :)
 
Yay, infoterror! Optimism! I like it.

And your last point about Summoning was both astute and brilliant. Bravo!
 
anonymousnick2001 said:
And your last point about Summoning

Listening to it now -- metal is lucky to have such a subtle and lovely act in its legions.

After hearing this, I cannot imagine going back to the blasting drone of most USBM/EUBM.