Build a supergroup for your favorite genres

Power Metal:

Lead Vocals: Sebastien Levermann (Orden Ogan)
Backing/Lead Vocals: Floor Jansen (Nightwish, After Forever)
Lead Guitar: Timo Tolkki (Stratovarius)
Rhythm Guitar: Magnus Karlsson (Primal Fear)
Bass: Frederik Larssen (Hammerfall)
Keyboard: Vadim Pruzhanov (Dragonforce)
Drums: Dir-Meyer Berhorn (Orden Ogan)

For me this would be fucking insane.
 
Last edited:
Prog Rock

Neal Pert (Rush)- drums
Robert Fripp (King Crimson)- guitar
Geddy Lee (Rush)- bass
Richard Wright (Pink Floyd)- synths
Cedric Bixar-Zavala (The Mars Volta)- vocals

Black Metal

Varg (Burzum)- vocals (in style of first three albums)
Rob Darken (Graveland)- synths
Hellhammer (Mayhem)- drums
Ihsahn (Emperor)- guitar
Khaos (Deathspell Omega)- bass
 
  • Like
Reactions: CiG
Thrash Metal:

Vocals: Dawn Cosby (R.I.P.)
Rhythm Guitar: Greg Fulton aka Ian Tafoya
Rhythm + Lead Guitar. Tommy Vetterli aka Tommy T. Baron
Bass: Ralf Hubert
Drums: Rick Colaluca
 
  • Like
Reactions: HamburgerBoy
i'd rather be the drummer (or keyboardist), i'm fucking hopeless on guitar. then again i guess in-crowd metal is characterised by an inability to play instruments.
 
Nah, you can be proficient, you just can't ever instrumentwank.

well at least this one actually applies to me unlike most of your criteria. i'm curious to hear what you think is (ever) appealing about instrumental masturbation actually. it kinda goes against my approach to all artforms and probably my entire personality honestly.
 
Instrumentwank is a relative thing obvs, but the general trend would be that artists preferred by the UltimateGuitar crowd or the average nerd that worships Tool and Dream Theater would be disfavored by the in-crowd.
 
so you're implicitly saying that these bands are too similar to certain albums from the in-crowd canon for this to simply be a matter of taste? idk maybe. i suspect if you named a list of bands from that crowd most of us would have a mixed bag of opinions though. i'm prone toward praising scorned mainstream shit and shitting on beloved staples myself, hence why getting namedropped as the banner figure of this so-called movement automatically makes me dubious about the legitimacy of the whole thing. i don't even like sabbat (uk) or heathen much, you should pretty much be high fiving me m8
 
I don't think that you'd be the poster child for the in-crowd by any means. There is one obvious choice and the fact that he doesn't post here anymore actually reinforces that. This of course only being true if HBB is right and not speaking out of bias. ;)
 
so you're implicitly saying that these bands are too similar to certain albums from the in-crowd canon for this to simply be a matter of taste? idk maybe. i suspect if you named a list of bands from that crowd most of us would have a mixed bag of opinions though. i'm prone toward praising scorned mainstream shit and shitting on beloved staples myself, hence why getting namedropped as the banner figure of this so-called movement automatically makes me dubious about the legitimacy of the whole thing. i don't even like sabbat (uk) or heathen much, you should pretty much be high fiving me m8

Yeah, basically. I might consider making some kind of poll to address this. There's no reason a Heathen fan should call Testament generic, there's no reason a Fates Warning fan should dismiss early Queensryche, it's laughable that there are many that praise 90s Virgin Steele and hate Manowar, etc. The in-crowd effect can be observed at least somewhat in that "list of greatest bands" game/thread thing a few years back.

You're like an archbishop or some shit btw, not the king or queen. Phylactery is your altar boy.