Dakryn I have to correct you on some of your historical interpretations. Slave owners were a relatively small percentage of American populace (especially when you include the North) but cash crops grown by slaves on plantations were hugely important to the Southern economy. So important that industrialization was well behind the North by the Civil War. Also, slave owners had the support of a great number of poor whites because of racial fears. This means that despite slave owners being a small percentage of the population, the society was heavily dependent on slavery and deeply racially divided.
You say that the slave economy was destroyed by the Civil War/Reconstruction which is not technically wrong, but it doesn't mean what you think. After Reconstruction ended free blacks worked almost entirely as share-croppers and debt-peons. Better than being slaves of course, but still totally marginalized.
Whoever said that industrialization happened on the backs of European immigrants is also technically right, but that was only because blacks were not allowed to work in Northern factories until WWI.
Finally Dakryn I'd like to ask that you stop saying "entitlement". This isn't 1980 and Ronald Reagan is not running for president.
You say that the slave economy was destroyed by the Civil War/Reconstruction which is not technically wrong, but it doesn't mean what you think. After Reconstruction ended free blacks worked almost entirely as share-croppers and debt-peons. Better than being slaves of course, but still totally marginalized.
Actually, some were basically re-enslaved through one of the more hilariously evil things I've ever heard of, basically they (the whites) made it illegal to be homeless...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Codes_(United_States)#Post-Civil_WarDo you have a link for this information? I realize that blacks were basically re-enslaved after the war (although no one called it slavery), but I was under the impression it was due to the inability of freedmen to make a decent living on their own. They had no property and no capital, and because southern white landowners had most of the tools necessary to agriculture they had little opportunity. Therefore, because they could make no living, many returned to the plantation owners (of their own volition, although not willingly, if that makes sense) and worked mostly for unfathomably low wages. I've never heard of this "illegal to be homeless" law, unless it was something enacted by the South during Reconstruction. I know the South tried to impose some restrictions on blacks that were thrown out pretty quickly.
Yeah, that was way more common, but *Cookie's link*Do you have a link for this information? I realize that blacks were basically re-enslaved after the war (although no one called it slavery), but I was under the impression it was due to the inability of freedmen to make a decent living on their own. They had no property and no capital, and because southern white landowners had most of the tools necessary to agriculture they had little opportunity. Therefore, because they could make no living, many returned to the plantation owners (of their own volition, although not willingly, if that makes sense) and worked mostly for unfathomably low wages. I've never heard of this "illegal to be homeless" law, unless it was something enacted by the South during Reconstruction. I know the South tried to impose some restrictions on blacks that were thrown out pretty quickly.
1.) How old are you?
2.) Who do you live with?
3.) How tall are you?
4.) Where are you now?
1.) 23
2.) Alone
3.) 5'4/163 cm
4.) Toyo High School, Tagawa City, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan
Ultimate Metal: Where 90% of the metalest metallers live with their parents.
The Black Codes are what I was referring to when I said "something enacted by the South during Reconstruction." And they didn't last one year, if I'm correct.
Mathiäs;8984141 said:Fine, but then you had things like Jim Crow laws and countless other variants of such.