Christians suck; world still turns

Going out of my way to offend someone implies that I was targeting him specifically and that I had malicious intent. It was a random comment I made in the forum that I didn't think he (or anyone) would take seriously.
 
Going out of my way to offend someone implies that I was targeting him specifically and that I had malicious intent. It was a random comment I made in the forum that I didn't think he (or anyone) would take seriously.

Fair enough, though it was still pretty tasteless.
 

Apples to Oranges sir. Someone being a legal citizen of Scotland is a vastly different than edit: claimed religious affiliation.

Dakryn really does have a problem with arguing incoherent nonsense, doesn't he.

Your smug overtones are amusing. Much of what I see here in the debates is poor choice of supporting "facts". Using a survey as proof is weak. Besides being completely manipulatible by the surveyor in question wording and surveyee selection, you're also trusting that you arent getting complete bullshit answers from participants.

If you pulled actual church membership rosters from all the major denominations thats still weak (just not as bad), because churches have a bad habit of not removing people who die, move, quit going, etc. Its not unusal for a churches membership role to be 150-200%+ of its actual regular attendence, and with the way people move around now you could have the same family on multiple rosters.

Pull actual church attendance averages for a year in america and I gauruntee it wont be anywhere near 75%.
 
No I see exactly where he was going with it, and it's not the same thing. Its a bad analogy based off poor reading comprehension, maybe I should have been more clear on my reasoning before.

If you think calling bullshit on survey results in favor of checking actual participatory data is shifting a line of definition/a fallacy, you are the illogical participant in this.
 
Well, OK...a lot of people who SAY they are Catholics are really not believers but probably more on the fairweather side of things...but you can't exactly have a survey that says "so are you a REALLY REAL Catholic or are you just SAYING YOU ARE"
 
So you can't be a Christian if you don't regularly attend church? What the fuck are you saying you fucking bane of the intellectual establishment? Do you even fucking realize that the No True Scotsman fallacy isn't actually about Scottish citizenship? Get the fuck out of this forum.
 
^I do not think Jesus was against Christians gathering and supporting each other in their common faith. He did oppose the hypocritical religious leaders who had grown to love religion and the power it gave them, rather than to love God and others. It got him killed.
 
If you think calling bullshit on survey results in favor of checking actual participatory data is shifting a line of definition/a fallacy, you are the illogical participant in this.

What the fuck participatory data are you even talking about? You've presented NO evidence to suggest that the survey is inaccurate. You are simply bullheadedly insisting that the survey cannot POSSIBLY be accurate, which is exactly what that fallacy is. Please grow a brain already, for christ's sake.