The Ozzman
Melted by feels
There's still a chance Obama could die in office of natural causes, albeit the chance is very miniscule.
Yes because cutting taxes is bad
totally bra.Such a stupid concept, letting people spend their money as they see fit. What we need is someone with the wisdom and experience lol to bring CHANGE AND HOPE OMG LAWDY YES!
Yes because cutting taxes is bad
totally bra.Such a stupid concept, letting people spend their money as they see fit. What we need is someone with the wisdom and experience lol to bring CHANGE AND HOPE OMG LAWDY YES!
Perhaps you retards would like to stop rubbing your noses in each other's butts for a moment and explain why we shouldn't have programs that provide important stuff like housing, health care and education to people who deserve it but can't afford it.
Perhaps you retards would like to stop rubbing your noses in each other's butts for a moment and explain why we shouldn't have programs that provide important stuff like housing, health care and education to people who deserve it but can't afford it.
- Why do federal taxes necessarily have to pay for this?
because people suck and we should weed out the weak.
~gR~
Various charity stats: http://blog.charitynavigator.org/2009/06/giving-in-2008.html
Main item of note:
"Charities in America received $307.65 billion in donations last year."
Compare that to $2.52 trillion which the federal gov't made last year (link). That doesn't exactly inspire optimism that charity could replace taxes.
well, i understand how much the country brings in total from taxes. i was asking how much gets put towards these social programs. not the military
~gR~
Ideally, lower taxes would stimulate the economy and allow businesses to operate at a level where they could hire more employees, thus lowering the level of unemployment and the amount of money required for charities to support the jobless.
Also, the higher the employment level, the higher the number of people who will be able to donate money to charities.