Dakryn's Batshit Theory of the Week

Church burning occurs in California; Varg unavailable for comment

ORANGEVALE, Calif. --
A 15-year-old girl who allegedly worships Satan was arrested Tuesday on suspicion of lighting a fire at her Orangevale church.

The blaze occurred at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints at the corner of Hazel and Cherry avenues.

Christian Pebbles of Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District said the teen made it clear why she started the blaze, which damaged church pews.

"She hates the church and she worships the devil," Pebbles said. "That's the reason why."

Pebbles said the teen was taken into custody on suspicion of felony arson.

"Well, you know, kids sometimes don't always like what their parents want them to do," said Annette Hilt, the suspect's mother. "Everybody knows that."

There were nearly 50 other church members inside when the blaze took place.

"The flames were about 4 feet high inside the chapel," church facilities director Pat Elmer said.

Fire officials said the goal is to make sure that the girl receives counseling, not to necessarily punish her.
 
http://www.reuters.com/article/CMPSRV/idUSN2130700220090921

Proposed FCC Web rule change draws wireless ire
Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:23pm EDT
By John Poirier and Sinead Carew

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK, Sept 21 (Reuters) - U.S. phone
companies may be forced to open their wireless networks to
rival Internet services like Skype and Google Voice under a
proposal brought out by the top telecom regulator to safeguard
so-called Internet neutrality.

The proposal, if adopted, would be a victory for consumer
advocates and big Internet companies like Google Inc (GOOG.O: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz)
at the expense of telecom operators like AT&T Inc (T.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz),
Verizon Communications (VZ.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) and Sprint Nextel Corp (S.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz).

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius
Genachowski said operators should not be able to discriminate
against any Internet applications or content and would have to
make management practices for Web traffic transparent.

While he appeared to address operators' network management
concerns, the wireless industry criticized the proposal and
analysts said it could hurt profits for mobile operators, which
had not been targeted by previous Net neutrality requirements.

"The risk to the wireless carriers is that they won't be
able to stop customers from using free voice and text services
like Skype or Google voice," said Bernstein analyst Craig
Moffett. "Voice and text are where they make all of their
money."

The FCC has already been examining why Apple Inc (AAPL.O: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz)
rejected Google Voice for use on iPhone, sold by AT&T.

The new proposal could result in mobile customers cutting
their phone bills by opting for minimum carrier voice plans and
doing without text-messaging plans if they use mobile voice and
text services from Skype and Google.

Piper Jaffray analyst Christopher Larsen downplayed the
risk, saying that if they have to, operators would be sure to
find a way to change their fees in order to maintain profits.

Advocates of Net neutrality have long argued that service
providers must be barred from blocking or slowing Internet
traffic based on the content being sent or downloaded.

But service providers say the increasing volume of
bandwidth-hogging services -- such as video sharing -- puts
pressure on them as it requires active network management, and
some argue that Net neutrality could stifle innovation.

AT&T, the No. 2 U.S. mobile service, said it was concerned
about an extension of Net neutrality rules to the competitive
mobile industry.

The new regulations would limit consumer choices and
"affect content providers, application developers, device
manufacturers and network builders," said an executive at
Verizon, which owns the No. 1 mobile service with Vodafone
Group Plc (VOD.L: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz).

Wireless trade group CTIA, whose members include AT&T,
Verizon Wireless and Sprint Nextel (S.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz), said it was concerned
the proposal would have "unintended consequences." Leading
Cable provider Comcast Corp (CMCSA.O: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) said it was pleased
Genachowski "recognized that networks need to be managed."

For his proposal to be adopted, Genachowski, a Democrat,
needs majority approval from FCC commissioners, who include two
other Democrats and two Republicans.

The rule will be formally proposed at an October meeting.
Colin Crowell, Genachowski's special counselor, told reporters
a final rule would likely arrive next spring.

Skype applauded the proposal and Google said it "could not
be more pleased." Consumer groups saw the move as a victory.

"This is a tremendous day for millions of us who have been
clamoring to keep the Internet free from discrimination." said
John Silver, executive director of advocacy group Free Press.

ANTI-DISCRIMINATION, PRO TRANSPARENCY

Genachowski proposed adding two new principles to four
existing principles the FCC issued several years ago. They
would prevent network operators from blocking consumer access
to any lawful Internet content, applications, and services.
Users would also be able to use any non-harmful devices.

In an effort to reassure businesses, Genachowski said
providers will not need to disclose personal subscriber data or
anything that might compromise network security.

In a speech in Troy, New York, President Barack Obama said
the government should make "common-sense ground rules" to
ensure a "level playing field" for all Internet participants.

Senator Byron Dorgan, a North Dakota Democrat, applauded
the announcement, saying he will help the FCC move quickly.

The proposal coincides with a deadline for the FCC to file
a court brief in a case against Comcast, which is challenging
the agency's authority to regulate actions involving the Web.

The FCC defended its position by arguing that it has broad
authority under the 1996 Telecommunications Act.

While Google shares ended 1.1 percent higher at $497 on the
Nasdaq, Sprint shares were down 0.7 percent at $4.25 on the New
York Stock Exchange. AT&T ended down 0.7 percent and Verizon
shares dipped 0.3 percent on the NYSE.
(Additional reporting by Sinead Carew and Caren Bohan in New
York; Editing by Maureen Bavdek, Dave Zimmerman and Matthew
Lewis)

Good. Fuck you, you fascist, money-grubbing piece of shit phone companies. I hope you all go under.
 
Is the U.S. Preparing to Bomb Iran?
Is the U.S. Stepping Up Preparations for a Possible Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities?
By JONATHAN KARL
Oct. 6, 2009—


Is the U.S. stepping up preparations for a possible attack on Iran's nuclear facilities?

The Pentagon is always making plans, but based on a little-noticed funding request recently sent to Congress, the answer to that question appears to be yes.

First, some background: Back in October 2007, ABC News reported that the Pentagon had asked Congress for $88 million in the emergency Iraq/Afghanistan war funding request to develop a gargantuan bunker-busting bomb called the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP). It's a 30,000-pound bomb designed to hit targets buried 200 feet below ground. Back then, the Pentagon cited an "urgent operational need" for the new weapon.

Now the Pentagon is shifting spending from other programs to fast forward the development and procurement of the Massive Ordnance Penetrator. The Pentagon comptroller sent a request to shift the funds to the House and Senate Appropriations and Armed Services Committees over the summer.

Click here to see a copy of the Pentagon's request, provided to ABC News.

The comptroller said the Pentagon planned to spend $19.1 million to procure four of the bombs, $28.3 million to accelerate the bomb's "development and testing", and $21 million to accelerate the integration of the bomb onto B-2 stealth bombers.


'Urgent Operational Need'
The notification was tucked inside a 93-page "reprogramming" request that included a couple hundred other more mundane items.

Why now? The notification says simply, "The Department has an Urgent Operational Need (UON) for the capability to strike hard and deeply buried targets in high threat environments. The MOP is the weapon of choice to meet the requirements of the UON." It further states that the request is endorsed by Pacific Command (which has responsibility over North Korea) and Central Command (which has responsibility over Iran).


Is the U.S. Preparing to Bomb Iran?
The request was quietly approved. On Friday, McDonnell Douglas was awarded a $51.9 million contract to provide "Massive Penetrator Ordnance Integration" on B-2 aircraft.

This is not the kind of weapon that would be particularly useful in Iraq or Afghanistan, but it is ideally suited to hit deeply buried nuclear facilities such as Natanz or Qom in Iran.


Copyright © 2009 ABC News Internet Ventures

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-preparing-bomb-iran/story?id=8765343#
 
McDonnell Douglas non-existence aside, the Marine Corp has been war-gaming to attack Iran for a while. Based off the way we were training I expected to attack Iran over a year ago, so I won't be suprised when we actually do attack, or Israel does anyway.