Dakryn's Batshit Theory of the Week

Unfair point; if we are pointing figures on account of party lines and the views that come with them, why are you not following the same line of thinking? Clearly he's just a retard, and no Democrat thinks that was a smart thing to say.

Grant mentioned a repblican name, so I was balancing it with a democratic name drop. If I wanted to point a finger at a (current office holding) Republican I would start with John McCain. I don't know how the guy keeps getting re-elected in AZ, everyone I talk to hates him. Most military I have talked to do not like him, yet he likes to champion himself as some sort of voice of veterans.
He was a shitty pilot who happened to have a admiral for a father to cover up for his shitty body of military work, and that's the least damning thing about him.
 
I wonder about that Dakryn. Maybe there tons of people that like him? It like the time when a cousin from Florida was saying how people he know didn't like DMB, yet they still sellout concerts in Florida
 
Grant mentioned a repblican name, so I was balancing it with a democratic name drop. If I wanted to point a finger at a (current office holding) Republican I would start with John McCain. I don't know how the guy keeps getting re-elected in AZ, everyone I talk to hates him. Most military I have talked to do not like him, yet he likes to champion himself as some sort of voice of veterans.
He was a shitty pilot who happened to have a admiral for a father to cover up for his shitty body of military work, and that's the least damning thing about him.

How about how he has consistently blocked funding for the military to find and recover Vietnam POW/MIA's? Traitor.
 
Democrats aren't guilty of wacky conspiracy theory promotion? What? Didn't they warn us that Bush was going to declare martial law and then enthrone himself as dictator of America? Just sayin'...

Uh, well, he DID expand the government to it's largest size in the history of this country, he DID enact the Patriot Act, etc...and I don't think anyone actually used that as a talking point for their electoral platform, whereas several wackjob dumbass tea party faggots have said far worse things about Obama to large crowds of dumbasses.

Grant mentioned a repblican name, so I was balancing it with a democratic name drop. If I wanted to point a finger at a (current office holding) Republican I would start with John McCain. I don't know how the guy keeps getting re-elected in AZ, everyone I talk to hates him. Most military I have talked to do not like him, yet he likes to champion himself as some sort of voice of veterans.
He was a shitty pilot who happened to have a admiral for a father to cover up for his shitty body of military work, and that's the least damning thing about him.

While I hate McCain's guts, he's a far better person that far-right crazy that's running against him. Arizona is a dumbass state anyway. Their recent laws have demonstrated this.
 
Mathiäs;9072210 said:
Uh, well, he DID expand the government to it's largest size in the history of this country, he DID enact the Patriot Act, etc...and I don't think anyone actually used that as a talking point for their electoral platform, whereas several wackjob dumbass tea party faggots have said far worse things about Obama to large crowds of dumbasses.

So what has Obama done to undo all the horrible things Bush did? Not a single damn thing. You need to wake up out of this Democratic savior pipe dream. If Obama had at a bare minimum had successfully worked to repeal the Patriot Act, or any of the "national emergency" related presidential directives I would be most happy, regardless of the pile of bullshit passed as "health reform". But he has not, and has not made any move to end the "war on terror" or any other abomination Bush started.

Mathiäs;9072210 said:
While I hate McCain's guts, he's a far better person that far-right crazy that's running against him. Arizona is a dumbass state anyway. Their recent laws have demonstrated this.

Considering Phoenix is the Kidnapping capitol of the US, I don't see how you can call the new immigration law dumb. Arizona has some of the best (read: least restrictive) laws in the country. Of course you think government is superior to everyone and that the masses need to be escorted through life, right?
I am not aware of anything about Hayworth that makes him "much worse" than John McCain.
 
Arizona law is terrible because it will inevitably lead to racial profiling. You shouldn't have to produce ID for the police unless you are suspected of a crime. If they're going to allow them to make you produce documents purely because they suspect you are an illegal immigrant, then of course hispanic people are going to be unfairly targeted by law enforcement.
 
Hey man, the federal government is evil but state governments and their hired guns can totally be trusted...at least when they're dealing with brown people.
 
America wasn't built by immigrants, it was built by the hard working native born sons who pulled up their bootstraps. God loved that shit so much that he let us worship him and all his love.

Kill faggots and deport everything that moves!
 
Arizona law is terrible because it will inevitably lead to racial profiling. You shouldn't have to produce ID for the police unless you are suspected of a crime. If they're going to allow them to make you produce documents purely because they suspect you are an illegal immigrant, then of course hispanic people are going to be unfairly targeted by law enforcement.

I don't see why it's wrong to profile based off a very obvious situation. Either way, making more laws about something that is already against the law isn't going to solve the problem. But the law is no more stupid than doing nothing about the problem/offering amnesty/continuing to allow freebies.
 
I think the real problem with the AZ immigration law is that (from what I can tell) the cops can basically stop anyone at any time, challenge their citizenship status for the pure hell of it, and if the person just happens to not be carrying documents establishing proof of citizenship at that time then they're subject to arrest. I'd call that a vastly more serious concern than racial profiling.
 
I think the real problem with the AZ immigration law is that (from what I can tell) the cops can basically stop anyone at any time, challenge their citizenship status for the pure hell of it, and if the person just happens to not be carrying documents establishing proof of citizenship at that time then they're subject to arrest. I'd call that a vastly more serious concern than racial profiling.
Racial profiling is intertwined in the problem you brought up. It is bad that the police can now stop people for no reason and it is bad that this will inevitably disproportionately affect a minority group.
 
Not to change the subject but, good job on transparency Obama Administration:

http://oilprice.com/Environment/Oil-Spills/The-Cover-up-BP-s-Crude-Politics-and-the-Looming-Environmental-Mega-Disaster.html

WMR has been informed by sources in the US Army Corps of Engineers, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and Florida Department of Environmental Protection that the Obama White House and British Petroleum (BP), which pumped $71,000 into Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign -- more than John McCain or Hillary Clinton, are covering up the magnitude of the volcanic-level oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and working together to limit BP's liability for damage caused by what can be called a "mega-disaster."

Obama and his senior White House staff, as well as Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, are working with BP's chief executive officer Tony Hayward on legislation that would raise the cap on liability for damage claims from those affected by the oil disaster from $75 million to $10 billion. However, WMR's federal and Gulf state sources are reporting the disaster has the real potential cost of at least $1 trillion. Critics of the deal being worked out between Obama and Hayward point out that $10 billion is a mere drop in the bucket for a trillion dollar disaster but also note that BP, if its assets were nationalized, could fetch almost a trillion dollars for compensation purposes. There is talk in some government circles, including FEMA, of the need to nationalize BP in order to compensate those who will ultimately be affected by the worst oil disaster in the history of the world.

Plans by BP to sink a 4-story containment dome over the oil gushing from a gaping chasm one kilometer below the surface of the Gulf, where the oil rig Deepwater Horizon exploded and killed 11 workers on April 20, and reports that one of the leaks has been contained is pure public relations disinformation designed to avoid panic and demands for greater action by the Obama administration, according to FEMA and Corps of Engineers sources. Sources within these agencies say the White House has been resisting releasing any "damaging information" about the oil disaster. They add that if the ocean oil geyser is not stopped within 90 days, there will be irreversible damage to the marine eco-systems of the Gulf of Mexico, north Atlantic Ocean, and beyond. At best, some Corps of Engineers experts say it could take two years to cement the chasm on the floor of the Gulf.

Only after the magnitude of the disaster became evident did Obama order Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to declare the oil disaster a "national security issue." Although the Coast Guard and FEMA are part of her department, Napolitano's actual reasoning for invoking national security was to block media coverage of the immensity of the disaster that is unfolding for the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean and their coastlines.

From the Corps of Engineers, FEMA, the Environmental Protection Agency, Coast Guard, and Gulf state environmental protection agencies, the message is the same: "we've never dealt with anything like this before."

The Obama administration also conspired with BP to fudge the extent of the oil leak, according to our federal and state sources. After the oil rig exploded and sank, the government stated that 42,000 gallons per day was gushing from the seabed chasm. Five days later, the federal government upped the leakage to 210,000 gallons a day.

However, WMR has been informed that submersibles that are monitoring the escaping oil from the Gulf seabed are viewing television pictures of what is a "volcanic-like" eruption of oil. Moreover, when the Army Corps of Engineers first attempted to obtain NASA imagery of the Gulf oil slick -- which is larger than that being reported by the media -- it was turned down. However, National Geographic managed to obtain the satellite imagery shots of the extent of the disaster and posted them on their web site.


There is other satellite imagery being withheld by the Obama administration that shows what lies under the gaping chasm spewing oil at an ever-alarming rate is a cavern estimated to be around the size of Mount Everest. This information has been given an almost national security-level classification to keep it from the public, according to our sources.

FREE Breaking Investment & Geopolitical Intelligence - Previously only available to Governments, Intelligence Agencies & selected Hedge Funds. Click here for more information on our Free Weekly Intelligence Report

The Corps and Engineers and FEMA are quietly critical of the lack of support for quick action after the oil disaster by the Obama White House and the US Coast Guard. Only recently, has the Coast Guard understood the magnitude of the disaster, dispatching nearly 70 vessels to the affected area. WMR has also learned that inspections of off-shore rigs' shut-off valves by the Minerals Management Service during the Bush administration were merely rubber-stamp operations, resulting from criminal collusion between Halliburton and the Interior Department's service, and that the potential for similar disasters exists with the other 30,000 off-shore rigs that use the same shut-off valves.

The impact of the disaster became known to the Corps of Engineers and FEMA even before the White House began to take the magnitude of the impending catastrophe seriously. The first casualty of the disaster is the seafood industy, with not just fishermen, oystermen, crabbers, and shrimpers losing their jobs, but all those involved in the restaurant industry, from truckers to waitresses, facing lay-offs.

The invasion of crude oil into estuaries like the oyster-rich Apalachicola Bay in Florida spell disaster for the seafood industry. However, the biggest threat is to Florida's Everglades, which federal and state experts fear will be turned into a "dead zone" if the oil continues to gush forth from the Gulf chasm. There are also expectations that the oil slick will be caught up in the Gulf stream off the eastern seaboard of the United States, fouling beaches and estuaries like the Chesapeake Bay, and ultimately target the rich fishing grounds of the Grand Banks off Newfoundland.

WMR has also learned that 36 urban areas on the Gulf of Mexico are expecting to be confronted with a major disaster from the oil volcano in the next few days. Although protective water surface boons are being laid to protect such sensitive areas as Alabama's Dauphin Island, the mouth of the Mississippi River, and Florida's Apalachicola Bay, Florida, there is only 16 miles of boons available for the protection of 2,276 miles of tidal shoreline in the state of Florida.

Emergency preparations in dealing with the expanding oil menace are now being made for cities and towns from Corpus Christi, Texas, to Houston, New Orleans, Gulfport, Mobile, Pensacola, Tampa-St.Petersburg-Clearwater, Sarasota-Bradenton, Naples, and Key West. Some 36 FEMA-funded contracts between cities, towns, and counties and emergency workers are due to be invoked within days, if not hours, according to WMR's FEMA sources.

There are plans to evacuate people with respiratory problems, especially those among the retired senior population along the west coast of Florida, before officials begin burning surface oil as it begins to near the coastline.

There is another major threat looming for inland towns and cities. With hurricane season in effect, there is a potential for ocean oil to be picked up by hurricane-driven rains and dropped into fresh water lakes and rivers, far from the ocean, thus adding to the pollution of water supplies and eco-systems.

This story contributed by the Wayne Madsen Report for Oilprice.com