And I was pointing out that it's not irrelevant and that the existence of public schooling does not make it irrelevant. Learn to read properly.
It really doesn't look nuts though unless someone reads into it what isn't there.
No, you're full of shit. The statement looks nuts on the face of it. Just because your intent was obvious to you doesn't mean it should have been obvious to the rest of us.
The existence of public schools shits on individual rights anyway, so what does it matter whether you could bring guns to school or not?
What about that statement insinuated that I believed children should be allowed to bring guns to school
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppBZM88mHvQ&feature=player_embedded#!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUOsq_45SnQ&feature=player_embedded
I salute these guys for taking a stand against these ego-maniacal fucktards. But IMO, the crowd in the first video should have helped that old timer out and are cowardly aiders and abettors of these lackeys for not doing so.
http://movieclips.com/watch/fletch-1985/hug-a-cop/
Lrn2context.
Lrn2clarify-ironic-or-crazy-statements
Also, Dakryn, I like how (yet again) you looked at my post as black vs. white; it's not either one or the other that sometimes you say crazy raving lunatic shit and sometimes you say things that are very obvious to anyone with a working brain, just phrased in ways that make those things out to be some kind of secret knowledge no one else has (oh my god, there's CORRUPTION in big corporations! dear lord, say it isn't so!1!). Notice the "sometimes". I figured it was implied because of the, you know, context, which you evidently know so much about.
I am not defeatist or pessimistic. Acknowledging problems doens't mean I am mopey all day. I am actually quite exuberant about life, it's awesome. Cyth has seen me IRL, I would think he would agree I am the opposite of "defeatist", at least in conduct.
I am the defeatist here, don't let Dak take my glory.