hi there....
i think the same 'bout how huge the improvement in sound is, after andy put his hands (ears, mid, stomach or whatever) on it.
i also think, that it was too dull sounding etc in the first version.....but:
i'm starting to feel a little pitty for Kelly Gray, i know that album is definitely not the best out there, but there are certainly worse mixes.
can't understand, why everyone's acting like that cd is the worst-mixed ever.
what i mean is is: i wouldn't dare saying "i'm a way better engineer than Kelly", so i'm careful with totally talking bad 'bout his work.
what andy did to it is amazing!! but i can't imagine it was that good, if the recording was TOTAL crap...
again....i don't like the old version, too, but i'm careful with talking too bad 'bout kelly's mixes until my work is way better than his.