By this logic, it is obvious in every kind of music, art...life in general. So we come to a "so what?" thing in the end.
I can't see how i said anything different than this. The "so what?" that i wrote before, was just an "answer" to that editorial. You people make me really wonder sometimes...Russell said:And by this logic everything kind of music, art... life in general should be approached with an ironic self-awareness rather than deadly seriousness. Following your rationale, which I think is fair, you end up with two distinct positions - you can either have no fun, comedy, irony or any of the other things in anything (the very things, in my mind that make life/art/music worthwhile and enjoyable), or you can embrace these things. I know which I prefer, and being able to embrace these things in no ways diminishes the impact of it all, and doesn't stop you taking it seriously. It's all about a balance, and, when it comes down to it, having the security in your tastes and opinions to view them objectively and make jokes about them from time to time...
I can't see how i said anything different than this. The "so what?" that i wrote before, was just an "answer" to that editorial. You people make me really wonder sometimes...
You people really make me wonder on how "in depth" you analyze someone's opinion about everything by two words he might write. My "knee-jerk reaction" (which was just 2-3 words, imagine how "knee jerk" is that) is nonexistant and my judgment to the editorial had nothing to do with anything "humor related", i just found the whole article to be shallow, clueless and definetely without any substance. That guy doesn't say anything new, it is a worlwide fact that almost everything can be funny in its own way. By the way, i took the article far less seriously than how you and Demilich took all the things i said in this thread.Your knee-jerk reaction to the editorial implied that the "so-what" situation you came to was one in which you'd rather people took everything with a humourless approach, rather than the willingness to be self-critical the editorial seemed to have. If this is not the case the tone of all your posts in this thread thus far belies your opinion, my apologies, and that's fair enough. If it is, then I was merely saying it makes a lot more sense - to me - to take a good look in the mirror and not take everything quite so seriously.
What's with the UM dissing just lately? Us staffers aren't all like the GMD posters, you know!
Necuratul said:Well I'm sure even the UM staff can agree that the average UM poster is still a fucking idiot.
dill_the_devil said:Oh, That goes without saying.
My "knee-jerk reaction" (which was just 2-3 words, imagine how "knee jerk" is that) is nonexistant and my judgment to the editorial had nothing to do with anything "humor related", i just found the whole article to be shallow, clueless and definetely without any substance.
MajestikMøøse;6023724 said:above my computer desk I still have an image of Rob Darken in the forest in full armor with his half drawn bow tacked on the wall.
It is glorious.