Yes, it's not so obvious, so I'll explain it in a more practical way:
changso said:
"2. The cause of suffering is desire."
The way I figure it, desire isn't the cause of suffering, it's quite the opposite.
Ok, let's take a few examples.
- You are disgruntled with your life because you have no money and you have to work a shit job getting crapped on all the time. So you suffer. Why are you suffering? It's because you desire something you do not have, that is more money, a better job, and not getting crapped on all the time. If you were accepting of your situation you would not suffer.
- You are sad because your entire family and your pet fish Goldie was wiped out by a fired. You suffer because you desire for that event to have not occured, and you desire your family and pet to still be alive. If you were accepting of their deaths and didn't desire them to still be alive, you wouldn't suffer.
- Your girlfriend is a raving bitch and it seems the point of her life is to make you miserable, so you suffer. You are suffering because you desire to be with someone who is kind and loving, and you desire to not be shit on all the time.
- You are getting old and your health is failing, which reminds you that your life will eventually result in more poor health and then death. You are suffering because you desire to be young and healthy and you desire to not die.
Can you think of a situation in which that sense of discontentment we have is not rooted in desire? I'm not talking about lacking the necessities of life, of course if you are starving or being tortured you will suffer physically, but I'm not talking about that. I'm talking only about psychological suffering.
Progression isn't possible without desire.
Happiness isn't possible with rampant desire leading you. Feeding one's desire does not lead to happiness, it merely raises the bar on what it takes to make you happy, that's why wealth does not buy contentment, in fact, I've read something recently that people who win the lottery are often more dissatisfied in with their lives than before they hit the jackpot.
How can we say no to war without desiring Peace?
We can't, but we shouldn't let the desire for peace make us miserable. We should do what we can to keep the peace, but accept it when our efforts are unsuccessful.
How can we walk without desiring it?
We can't. Desiring is who we are, it's how we are designed. But that doesn't mean we *have* to be miserable because we always want what we can't have, and because we cling to things which are impermanent. We must desire things, but we don't have to allow the fulfillment of those desires dictate our state of contentment (in most cases, I'm not talking about lacking the necessities of life (food/shelter) or physical pain).
Knowing ourself frustrated, fearful, segragated, how can we attain Compassion, love, harmony, unity without desiring it?
As I said, Buddhism is quite against the grain of how we normally think.
We don't have to really try to attain compassion, love, unity, they are there already, it's just that our inherent selfishness (egocentricism) and rampant desires keep us from seeing it. These feelings arise naturally when we stop worrying about getting ahead in life, when we stop being jealous of others who have more, when we stop trying to attain happiness by the perpetual feeding of desires (which doesn't work).
I mean, someone come and say me: "you can have this or that" I'll chose "this" or "that" according to my desires without needing one or the other necessarily.
If you didn't need either one then this is not a desire which is going unfufilled and making you unhappy, so it does not apply.
You wouldn't post in this very topic or on organized religion if you weren't desiring to bring some light in delusionnate minds or whatever.
Granted. However, I don't allow my desire for people to wake up and stop being so egocentric (which his what religion is all about) to dictate my state of happiness. I'm accepting that most people are hoplessly deluded and will live out their lives in the typical American dream fashion of trying to be happy by feeding the beast of desire, and by clinging to whacked notions of immortality and a blissful enternal afterlife. I accept reality as it is, but that doesn't mean that I should not try to improve upon it. I hope you see the subtlety of what I'm saying here.
Another example is that my older relatives are now getting sick and diseased and dying off. I don't want them to die, but when they do I will be accepting of it, I won't let my unfulfilled desire for them to live on to make me unhappy, and I won't allow the reminder of my own mortality and my desire to live make me unhappy.
You see, desire is the beginning of all creations...the alpha.
Yes, it's who we fundamentally are, and it's what animals are, and we cannot change that. What we can change however is our degree of acceptance of things by learning to accept things as they are and not allowing our desire for them to be different to make us discontent. That's Buddhism. It's actually much deeper than this, I'm completely leaving out that the root of desire is the illusory notion of a segregated ego. It gets really deep, but never kooky, never illogical, never impractical, always grounded in reason (imo).
On the other hand, I would say that needing something is the cause of suffering. When you NEED something, you're fearing what will eventually happens if you don't have it. In that case, you are so displeased with the situations and the fears eventually becomes anger...anger becomes suffering.
That's a perfectly valid way of looking at it. However, I would add, that people often suffer as a result of desires which *aren't* necessities, aren't needed. My sister is currently suffering because she has very little money, but does she need money? No. She just wants it. She has plenty to eat and shelter, she is taken care of by her husband, she has nothing to worry about or need for, but still she is suffering because she can't "buy things". Anger is also rooted in desire, which itself is rooted in the sense of a segregated ego.
Satori