Here we go. This is what we get for be tolerant of muslims in our government

This country will reach it's lowest point if Hillary Clinton wins. Actually, again the democrats are fielding ass candidates. A women, whose only reason for public office is because her "husband" was President, a mulato with pretty much zero experience, and Edwards, who for all intents and purposes HAS to be a homosexual. Not that I have anything against homo's, its just not an image a Presidency needs. unless of course she is a hot chick lesbian..thats cool.

Ehh, saying Obama "doesn't have enough experience" is not exactly a bad mark on his report card. If anything, its a leg up on his opponents.

John Edwards is so pathetically corrupt that his own constituents threw the ex-ambulance chaser out of office rather than endure his weak service on their behalf.

And Hillary... She ran for Senator on the claim that she "worked with children for 30 years." No mention whatsoever of her 30 years as one of the most brutal lawyers in Arkansas. No mention of her attempts to seize control of an equivalent 18 percent of the federal budget in 1993, ostensibly to run Hillarycare like a private state-within-a-state.

I swear, I still have memories of that goddamned flow chart on the floor of the senate... it was far most confusing than a circuit board from the movie "Paycheck" starring Bennifer Affleck. Its purpose was to build the Hillary Empire without legislative or exercutive controls, where its single master (Hillary) could divert funds in and out of 100-odd subdivisions, until not even the most accomplished trial lawer could figure it out.

And who can tell where the lord of this state-within-a-state would send billions of unaccounted-for dollars?

Anyway, Republican candidates also suck balls.

Jurched
 
Ehh, saying Obama "doesn't have enough experience" is not exactly a bad mark on his report card. If anything, its a leg up on his opponents.

John Edwards is so pathetically corrupt that his own constituents threw the ex-ambulance chaser out of office rather than endure his weak service on their behalf.

And Hillary... She ran for Senator on the claim that she "worked with children for 30 years." No mention whatsoever of her 30 years as one of the most brutal lawyers in Arkansas. No mention of her attempts to seize control of an equivalent 18 percent of the federal budget in 1993, ostensibly to run Hillarycare like a private state-within-a-state.

I swear, I still have memories of that goddamned flow chart on the floor of the senate... it was far most confusing than a circuit board from the movie "Paycheck" starring Bennifer Affleck. Its purpose was to build the Hillary Empire without legislative or exercutive controls, where its single master (Hillary) could divert funds in and out of 100-odd subdivisions, until not even the most accomplished trial lawer could figure it out.

And who can tell where the lord of this state-within-a-state would send billions of unaccounted-for dollars?

Anyway, Republican candidates also suck balls.

Jurched

i'll say it again, two words:

FRED THOMPSON!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Yeah Im voting for Fred Thompson. At least he has charisma, and our leader needs that. And..hes married to a chick like 20 years younger so hes obviously a smooth pimp.

he used to date country singer, Lorrie Morgan, too.
she said that she couldnt think of a single thing bad to say about him and that if he ran, she'd definitely vote for him.
his ex-wife says the same thing.

Fred got game. :lol:
 
Ehh, saying Obama "doesn't have enough experience" is not exactly a bad mark on his report card. If anything, its a leg up on his opponents.


Anyway, Republican candidates also suck balls.

Jurched

:headbang: Yeah, that's about only reason why I like Obama. "Not enough experience" is actually a plus. Also, Mike Gravel has been very fun to watch in the debates..... yeah, he's crazy but damn good fun....

The Republicans at least have Ron Paul running. Imagine that! an actual small government Republican not interested sucking off Christian Fundies :) :)
 
It's sad but, I can't think of anyone I would vote for right now. Aside from it being too early, I don't trust anyone. Both sides of the aisle don't really have shit for candidates. Ron Paul and Fred Thompson are appealing but, Ron seems a bit "out there" and Fred...Who the hell knows anything about Fred other than he's a cool motherfucker that might pull some of the left wing Law and Order vote. I actually had my wife take my temperature when I found myself thinking that Lieberman might not be such a bad idea.
I don't want to elect another politician. Where did all the great leaders go?

 
Who the hell knows anything about Fred other than he's a cool motherfucker that might pull some of the left wing Law and Order vote.


That, in a nut shell, is what cracks me up about people who say they'd vote for him. For most people, he is all style and image that they know from a tv show. Most likely, too, if he really starts to run he will not be acceptable to the right-wing religious base when they find out he is probably very socially moderate.
 
if he really starts to run he will not be acceptable to the right-wing religious base when they find out he is probably very socially moderate.

Most of the front runners for the GOP are not embracing the religious right and their fascists moral agenda............Which will help the party..........