How could this be?

Mar 20, 2006
62
0
6
http://www.pollingreport.com/right.htm

68% of Americans are dissatisfied with Bush's conduct. How can that be? Allow me to assess all of his accomplishments:

Capturing bin Laden was first priority after 9/11: okay, so he didn't follow through on this. But remember, Saddam was building weapons of mass destruction that somehow only members of the Bush administration could see. Clearly Saddam was more of a threat than bin Laden.

Promoting fiscal responsibility: er, okay so he didn't follow through on this either. However, it should be noted that Bush is just like Ronald "Jesus" Reagan in this regard, because both presided over huge defecits and recessions. We all know what a great leader Reagan was. After all, 9/11 wouldn't have happened without either of these men.

Defending America from terrorists: well it didn't work on 9/11, where federal-level indecision and confusion (as well as ignoring reports of a coming attack) allowed four hijacked airlines to cruise around America for a while and thus led to 3,000 of our citizens dead. Look on the bright side: Bush has confined all American dead to Iraq, so that is positive. We're being killed over there so we don't have to be killed over here.

The response to Hurricane Katrina: okay, we all know that it's the citizens' fault that they could not survive a category-5 hurricane on their own, especially the poor and homeless citizens. LOL, they actually expected FEMA to help them out or something. It's not FEMA's job to manage federal emergencies. The fact that the head of FEMA was a Bush appointee just shows that Bush does not engage in cronyism of any kind.

The Iraq War: okay so the WMD and connections to Al Qaeda stuff turned out to be lies. So what? We freed 30 million people, and they now have the freedom to kill one another in a bloody civil war. The Bush administration said they'd welcome us with open arms: what he meant was FIREARMS. Once again he was completely right. Bush also said Iraq would be a stable democracy by 2005. Again he was right.

The Wiretapping scandal: Sorry, but in order to combat terrorism we need to allow the executive branch bypass checks and balances and spy on its own citizens. That is the purpose of American democracy; to allow the president to do whatever he wants. The evil liberal media would have you believe that Bush needs a court order for wiretappings. Even though the constitution says so, they're still wrong. Bush is right.

So despite all this, what reasons are there to hate the Bush administration?
 
ConservativeWarrior said:
http://www.pollingreport.com/right.htm

68% of Americans are dissatisfied with Bush's conduct. How can that be? Allow me to assess all of his accomplishments:

Capturing bin Laden was first priority after 9/11: okay, so he didn't follow through on this. But remember, Saddam was building weapons of mass destruction that somehow only members of the Bush administration could see. Clearly Saddam was more of a threat than bin Laden.

Promoting fiscal responsibility: er, okay so he didn't follow through on this either. However, it should be noted that Bush is just like Ronald "Jesus" Reagan in this regard, because both presided over huge defecits and recessions. We all know what a great leader Reagan was. After all, 9/11 wouldn't have happened without either of these men.

Defending America from terrorists: well it didn't work on 9/11, where federal-level indecision and confusion (as well as ignoring reports of a coming attack) allowed four hijacked airlines to cruise around America for a while and thus led to 3,000 of our citizens dead. Look on the bright side: Bush has confined all American dead to Iraq, so that is positive. We're being killed over there so we don't have to be killed over here.

The response to Hurricane Katrina: okay, we all know that it's the citizens' fault that they could not survive a category-5 hurricane on their own, especially the poor and homeless citizens. LOL, they actually expected FEMA to help them out or something. It's not FEMA's job to manage federal emergencies. The fact that the head of FEMA was a Bush appointee just shows that Bush does not engage in cronyism of any kind.

The Iraq War: okay so the WMD and connections to Al Qaeda stuff turned out to be lies. So what? We freed 30 million people, and they now have the freedom to kill one another in a bloody civil war. The Bush administration said they'd welcome us with open arms: what he meant was FIREARMS. Once again he was completely right. Bush also said Iraq would be a stable democracy by 2005. Again he was right.

The Wiretapping scandal: Sorry, but in order to combat terrorism we need to allow the executive branch bypass checks and balances and spy on its own citizens. That is the purpose of American democracy; to allow the president to do whatever he wants. The evil liberal media would have you believe that Bush needs a court order for wiretappings. Even though the constitution says so, they're still wrong. Bush is right.

So despite all this, what reasons are there to hate the Bush administration?

They wear the most awful suits. They need something Italian, well tailored and smooth.
 
ZeeZooZum said:
He's a Christian......

Don't insult us Christians, it is our duty to dictate to Americans how to live their lives. Obviously if we allow queers to marry it will result in the complete downfall of American society. Men will be sodomizing themselves 24/7 in the streets and the Godless commie liberal pinkos will take over Washington DC and convert us all to Islam.

Everyone knows our founding fathers were Christian fundamentalists who didn't believe in separation of church and state. The religious right rules America, as we should, because we know what's best for everyone.

It disgusts me how liberals compare great men like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell to religious nuts like Osama bin Laden.

http://www.funnystrange.com/quiz/

Liberals are evil and eat babies.