hey guys!
how do you handle revisions? i think its normal that a band want a couple of changes here and there. but you all know the one asshole per band, that constantly wants to change things, mostly focussed totally on his own instrument (only comment he will make about other instruments is that they are too loud, 'burying' his instrument)
currently, i charge xy per song. the situation is that usually this works out because ppl want some changes, and most of the time its not that big of a deal. so i dont charge extra for revisions.
one band i currently work with has a member, that constantly is unhappy with his sound. he wants it EXACTLY like reference xy, not bothering that its a different kind of music and band, and that everything else has to bend around him. i wrote them a really long email, where i explained things like fletcher munson curve (he is ONLY judging in his car at a very loud level), masking, compression, headroom etc. really explaining all that stuff that makes it impossible to have a "drumsound like xy coupled with a guitar sond from yz" etc. you know what i mean.
i dont wanna loose em, because im havin fun with their music, but i think i can´t handle the constant (senseless) revisions, that make the mix only worse. it drives me crazy. i took a couple days off to A/B the versions, and the initial mix still sounds the absolute best.
im getting the impression that sometimes, a band cannot believe what u delivered is already as good as it will get, they just HAVE to get involved in the mix and changing things around, to (often) come to the conclusion that it was good the way it was in the first place. its such a waste of (unpayed) time in my opinion.
im charging really low with these guys, but i think i will charge them hourly from now on, lets see if i loose them.
how do you handle crap like this?
how do you handle revisions? i think its normal that a band want a couple of changes here and there. but you all know the one asshole per band, that constantly wants to change things, mostly focussed totally on his own instrument (only comment he will make about other instruments is that they are too loud, 'burying' his instrument)
currently, i charge xy per song. the situation is that usually this works out because ppl want some changes, and most of the time its not that big of a deal. so i dont charge extra for revisions.
one band i currently work with has a member, that constantly is unhappy with his sound. he wants it EXACTLY like reference xy, not bothering that its a different kind of music and band, and that everything else has to bend around him. i wrote them a really long email, where i explained things like fletcher munson curve (he is ONLY judging in his car at a very loud level), masking, compression, headroom etc. really explaining all that stuff that makes it impossible to have a "drumsound like xy coupled with a guitar sond from yz" etc. you know what i mean.
i dont wanna loose em, because im havin fun with their music, but i think i can´t handle the constant (senseless) revisions, that make the mix only worse. it drives me crazy. i took a couple days off to A/B the versions, and the initial mix still sounds the absolute best.
im getting the impression that sometimes, a band cannot believe what u delivered is already as good as it will get, they just HAVE to get involved in the mix and changing things around, to (often) come to the conclusion that it was good the way it was in the first place. its such a waste of (unpayed) time in my opinion.
im charging really low with these guys, but i think i will charge them hourly from now on, lets see if i loose them.
how do you handle crap like this?