Hypocrites?

[MarcusGHedwig]

Chucck Norris wont say the word fuck but he has no issue with walking through an airport double-fisting machine guns taking out 'bad guys'.

It's for the kids, you see.

SERIOUSLY

 

[drew_drummer]

Brutal.

 

[scorpio01169]

Would I be a hypocrite if I said I hated Mcdonalds food and would never eat it, but took a job there because I needed the money? Playing the role of a murderer in a movie, doesn't mean the person advocates murder.

 

[JHA]

I've eaten once in McDonalds (didn't have other choice at the time) and seriously don't understand who eats that shit. Never again. Chicken-skin steaks. uke:

 

[JHA]

Yes it is not pedophilia.
But who will buy such movie ?
A movie that looks like something that is very illegal in most countries.
IDK maybe i just can't judge the age of asian people correctly...
Show this pic (safe) to your wife and ask her how old the girl is:

Are you saying the film should/would be illegal if the actors look underage but are not? Compare to films where it looks like people are being killed.

If yes then you are being quite a hypocrite yourself.

 

[Mutant]

Are you saying the film should/would be illegal if the actors look underage but are not? Compare to films where it looks like people are being killed.

If yes then you are being quite a hypocrite yourself.

I am asking who will buy something that was made on purpose to LOOK like PEDOPHILIA.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_child_pornography

And your comparison is not valid here.
The only thing we could compare it to would be fake snuff films some sickos buy to wank to.

 

[egan.]

This has strayed so far from the point it's hilarious. The point is that you can have a different standard for the imaginary things that happen in movies, songs, art, books, theater and video games than you do for the things that happen real life without it being hypocrisy because one instance is pretend and the other is real.
Does everyone draw lines even for the things they'll pretend to do? Yes. Will that line be different from what it is for real life? Almost always. Will some people strictly refuse to patronize even fictional things that falls outside of their value system? Sure. Would the vast majority of those people still acknowledge a difference between real and pretend actions. Certainly.
The OP video at best displays irony rather than hypocrisy.

 

[JHA]

I am asking who will buy something that was made on purpose to LOOK like PEDOPHILIA.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_child_pornography

And your comparison is not valid here.
The only thing we could compare it to would be fake snuff films some sickos buy to wank to.

I don't know who will buy it, probably Japanese people? According to your quote the actress was 19. They are also acting in porn films just like in action films. The comparison is perfectly valid.

Now that you mentioned 'snuff films' there is a news article in the DailyMail with video http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...pting-acrobatics-power-electricity-pylon.html of some guy who was doing 'acrobatics on top of power electricity pylon'. Apparently they think it's totally ok to show a human exploding and dropping dead for real but it's a huge 'scandal' if some celebrity shows a bit of sideboob or a nipple, in which case they censor it. Now that's hypocrisy.