Originally posted by Lina
that's bullshit, CH. you're saying no music is better than any other music. granted "better" is subjective, but there are some basic guidelines as to what is respectable in music. there's a difference in quality between opeth and the strokes. and before you accuse me of such, that's not me kissing opeth's ass -- you could interject any number of bands in its place.
though a band could be more spiritual, complex, or original than many, you have no right to dictate wether it is better than them or not.
you see, as an example, I like Sentenced much more than Low. Sentenced is simple, heavy, direct and non-profound music in itself, yet it evokes simplistic feelings in me that I just love to feel. Low, in change, is made of really subtle and creative layers of guitar melody and distortion with deep concepts, which makes it one of the most avant-garde bands in slowcore, and yet I just can't stand it, no matter how many tries I give to it.
you can say Mozart has more quality than Def Leppard as much as Shakespeare has over Stephen King, but thing is, I may enjoy King more than Shakespeare. why? because it brings me a nice, protein-lacking candy bar which right now I prefer over an A-class, healthy gourmet dinner.
same with all kind of music, be it Britney Spears for 12-year old girlies, fucking Slipknot for rebellious teenagers, Kenny Rogers for old cowboys, etc...
music is not a thing anyone can just embrace. most people just dig it for a moment of fun and cannot go beyond it. other people might indeed dig it for the sake of profoundity, but still won't be able to understand another kind of music (that can still be very creative and profound) which their nature doesn't stands for.
so, what's this so called superiority? for me nothing but mere bullshit.