No, because I do not accept the premise of this question.mourningstar said:
Any further madness a woman experiences as a reaction to her husband is bound to have resulted from the husband's reaction to the woman's initial insanity. Therefore, the wife is still at fault.
this leads to a question: "why did the imaginary man we're talking about decided to marry the imaginary woman, then?". he must have been insane in the first place.Wandrail said:No, because I do not accept the premise of this question.
mainly because he does not exist.Wandrail said:
and if he does, he's ineffable. and he's not telling anything more to wandrail than to any child murderer, whether we like it or not. personally, i'd love it.mourningstar said:
i'm sorry if that's the only thing you've been given by women. even if from the way you talk that's probably the only thing you care for.Myrrdin said:
no, i don't want to step in a public toilet and find, instead of the usual cleaning woman who looks at you as if to say "i cleaned, so give me some money", a serial killer whose face reveals he's thinking about how sweet your flesh must taste. no way.ante said:I think death penalty is an easy way out, let them clean toilets for their rest of their lifes........with their gob
No no, it is because for whatever reaso, women tend not to give in to insanity until the male subject has already bound himself to her legally. In some cases a couple lives together before marriage and the woman cannot keep herself from displaying some degree of madness, at which point the man may flee, or as is often the case within the marriage, he will spend too much time in denial and confusion, thus going through with the completion of union. There are men, of course, who see full well the insanity of their partner and carry on without considering leaving, and perhaps these men are insane, I will grant you that.mourningstar said:
I disagree, but one things for sure we'll all find out eventually, eh?
I keep hitting this damn button on my mouse accidentally and erasing my posts when I go to submit them. It is making me mad. However, I would counter the ineffability of God - he is ineffable in that he cannot be 'worked out' within the limitations of the human mind. God cannot be 'solved', he can however reveal himself. The Jew and the Christian would both say that God can be experienced, that God reveals himself to his followers, and to mankind. The hindu ascetic also would claim to experience the spiritual or divine, and while I do not believe in hinduism, it, like Judaism and Christianity is actually a process of growth to get to know God or to gain spiritual enlightenment through prayer, reading divinely inspired scriptures, and changing one's life - the latter of which is actually a byproduct of the former two. I believe in the principle of divine purpose, so while I think God certainly had just as much to tell Hitler as he has to tell me, its not quite what you're saying, which is the agnostic/deist way of thinking, that he's not telling anyone anything and if he tried you wouldn't understand it anyway.rahvin said:
i guess that mostly leaves out the part that implies that your personal choices on the matter reveal you're sane, right?Wandrail said:
only if god happens to exist. if there is nothing at all i won't experience it, and, alas, i will never be able to think "ha-ahh, i was right". that's why i have to think it nowWandrail said:I disagree, but one things for sure we'll all find out eventually, eh?
But we are deceived! Women are attractive and sexy and appear sweet and caring and all of this at first. So evidence to the contrary not withstanding, we decide this one is different. Then you find the bottles of zoloft and maybe then take a hint...or not.mourningstar said:i guess that mostly leaves out the part that implies that your personal choices on the matter reveal you're sane, right?
and one last thing (just to go on with the joke-theory, of course): you say that women manifest their insanity after the paper as been signed. but well, if that were true men should have known by experience it often goes like that, so signing the document they accept to run the risk.
But enough about me.True.....But I don't think you're right.only if god happens to exist. if there is nothing at all i won't experience it, and, alas, i will never be able to think "ha-ahh, i was right". that's why i have to think it now
Clinically speaking there is no such thing as temporary insanity. It's more or less a term coined by the world media to explain something they don't fully understand. A person is either insane or sane. In other words, an individual doesn't move back and forth between sanity and insanity, they experience psychotic episodes. I know it's a thin line being drawn, but if this was more widely understood we might see more resources placed into rehabilitation.Life Sucks said:
