I like the idea , even myself if I know I cannot post there, this could be a solution. Nazi, but I think it could be interesting.
But anyway, I'm for heavier moderation, 100%.
And I'm also for something else : heavier moderation of people ON THEMSELVES. Too many off topic posts in interesting threads. Makes reading difficult sometimes, I already try myself to restrain from posting useless posts and try to elaborate most of them. Or at least I'll be doing that from now. Everyone wins : posts are much more interesting, no waste of space on the webpage, not too many pages full of useless shit. Of course, a joke some time to time is cool, but too much is not.
Also, I would be interested in heavier thread lock but at one condition : the last posts should contain a link to an answer to the question.
Why ?
Cause when you are searching for something, and find 3914 results, only like 5% are relevant, and when you open one of the 95% restant, you don't have the answer since people are saying "use the search function".
If you post a link to the most relevant thread (we could have a list of the most relevant threads for most basic questions so that moderators would just have to pick them up here, or ourselves if we can answer before the moderators) it would be useful since if someone uses the search function he might have more chances to end finding what he is after, and will not have to post.
This should be done a way so that noobs wouldn't post thinking they will have immediate link to the answer which would be the bad effect of this behavior.
Also, renaming the useful threads so that they are easier to find could be interesting.
I don't know how moderation is done here, is there a way to count how much threads have been locked against a member ? So that if he has been asking 3 times something really too obvious (like "I want brutal tones / gearbox" or "will S2.0 improve the brootlz of my song?") he gets banned.