For starters, LaBrie is the reason why I'm singing in a progressive metal band today (and I know I'm not the only one). Nobody sounded like him when "Images And Words" came out, and everyone took notice. Yes, his vocal cord rupture did much to hurt his live performance for quite some time, but if you don't think he did a hell of a job despite this shortcoming or that he has regained the good majority of his range in the past six years, then I seriously question the quality of your eardrums.
Had LaBrie been given ample time to recover from his vocal cord rupture, he most likely would have come back stronger for subsequent tours. However, he went on a world tour a mere three weeks after surgery. Any other singer would have insisted on the band cancelling the tour. It just goes to show the dedication that LaBrie has to the band and their fans.
LaBrie still has nights when he sounds shrill (just watch "Chaos In Motion" for some examples; Portnoy should have--and easily could have--chosen better performances for this DVD), but keep in mind that no other singer in this genre tours even half as much as he does, let alone performs for the length of time that he does each night. I would love to see any other singer step up to the plate for James. I guarantee you that their voices wouldn't hold up any better.
I know there are a lot of complaints about LaBrie on forums, but I think that comes with being a well-known artist. The more famous you are, the more detractors you have. Let's face it: James LaBrie is the most well-known singer in the world of progressive metal. By comparison, John Petrucci is considered sloppy in plenty of online communities. Has that stopped thousands and thousands of people from seeing them in concert or buying their CDs? Not in the least.
Jasonic, I can understand your distaste for LaBrie, considering your choice of bands. However, to say that he sounds weak covering Metallica is rather harsh. Being that James is primarily a melodic vocalist, I think he utilizes his grit rather well. I feel that he did justice to "Master Of Puppets." Oddly enough, I think he sounded weaker covering Iron Maiden. You would think he'd have it easier with Bruce Dickinson's material than James Hetfield's output.
Let's take a look at some of the suggested replacements on this thread:
Khan--Are you kidding me? Have you heard this guy on the last two Kamelot tours? He can't even handle a three-month tour performing 90-minute sets! His voice wouldn't exist after performing 2-3-hour shows on the road for a year straight!
Lance King--I personally like Lance as a singer. However, I don't exactly think of power when I listen to him. Zod, it kills me that you absolutely love Lance yet abhor James. They certainly have their differences, but I think they have a similar approach to the high end. Anyway, Lance isn't quite as diverse as James. He has a specific sound to which he likes to stick, which suits me just fine as a listener. He'd sound great on stuff like "Under A Glass Moon," but do you think he would sound just as convincing on "I Walk Beside You?" I doubt it.
Russell Allen--One of my favorite vocalists. He would come close to pulling off the different sides of Dream Theater's music. He would give the heavier songs even more balls, and he can match the emotion of LaBrie on the lightest stuff. However, I cringe at the thought of him behind the mike on pop-influenced songs like "Prophets Of War." Besides, I don't think he'd hold up so well on such a lengthy touring schedule.
Mikael Akerfeldt--Now I know you're kidding. Anybody who wants to claim that LaBrie sounds too breathy when he's singing ballads couldn't possbily, in a perfect world, be a Mikael Akerfeldt fan. I've never heard a weaker singer for lighter music in my life! Mind you, I've seen Opeth three times, one of those times being for the "Damnation" tour with Porcupine Tree. Akerfeldt has no range outside of the half-octave represented on the sung portions of Opeth's songs. Other than that, he can growl. How would growling work with Dream Theater? I have two words for you: it wouldn't.
Michael Eriksen--I think he would be the best fit for Dream Theater out of all of the singers mentioned. His range is excellent, his tone is very pleasing, and his delivery is full of emotion. It's really just a matter of how well he could handle the constant touring.
Overall, I agree with Portnoy when he says that James is the voice of Dream Theater, like him or not. The pairing is just right.
Finally, for those who argue that LaBrie sounds better on his solo material (and I agree), there's a good reason for that. LaBrie is one of the main songwriters of his own material. If anyone knows Dream Theater well enough, they should know that Portnoy and Petrucci (especially Portnoy) pretty much dictate every single note that the band produces. Otherwise, they give the thumbs up or the thumbs down on any ideas suggested by the other members. When it comes to vocals, Mike and John have written about 85% of the band's lyrics for the past four albums, and they have told LaBrie exactly how they want him to sing those lyrics. Perhaps it's not LaBrie that everyone should be dissing. Have you heard the backing vocals emitted from these otherwise talented musicians? These guys are telling their vocalist how to sing!
With that (and I know there's a lot of that), I would buy ProgPower tickets in an instant if LaBrie was on the bill.
Stay metal. Never rust.
Albert