Let's talk wrasslin'

Thanks man, I appreciate that. I'm very sorry for your loss as well. I think it's something only a pet owner who really develops a bond with their animal or animals can really understand. It's totally different to human relationships as the animal never judges you, never has ulterior motives and is never anything other than what they are. It's an incredibly pure connection that you just don't get with another human. You develop a routine with that animal and, if you're lucky, it's something that enriches your life and brings light into even the darkest days. Even when I was feeling really ill, angry or upset, just seeing Tia would be enough to lift my spirits and keep me going. She didn't have to do anything other than be herself. Losing that is hard to accept, and having that connection severed is emotionally devastating. I can tell from the way you wrote about your dog that you'll understand exactly what I mean.

The hardest part with losing Tia was that it was really unexpected. She was 11, so whilst she wasn't young, as a miniature poodle she wasn't old for her breed either. She hadn't shown any signs of problems, she seemed fine. Then she had a few days where her stomach wasn't right, so I took her to the vet and she had lost a fairly significant amount of weight from the summer (difficult to tell with her coat, unfortunately). Blood tests showed that she had chronic kidney disease, but we were told it could be managed and she could still live for some time. We got renal food for her and everything else necessary.

I then headed to Finland for a 3 week trip to see my significant other (I shared Tia with my parents, so there was no change for her other than me not being there), but five days in I got a message from my family saying that her new blood tests weren't good and she may only have days left if her condition didn't improve. She'd gone downhill very fast, and had stopped eating or drinking, which is obviously a bad sign. She was having to be syringe fed and was being given water that way too. I booked an early flight home, got back 9pm on the Sunday, having only arrived in Finland at 10pm on the previous Monday. She was family to me, though, and I had to be there with her. She came to the door to greet me, wagging her tail, but I could see how frail and weak she'd become. It was a shock, as when I left she hadn't been anything close to that bad. A few hours later she passed away. She'd literally gone to the vet twice the day before and they hadn't indicated she would imminently die, and despite her issues they didn't even recommend euthanasia at that point. She'd been fairly bright on those visits, but by that Sunday night she started spiralling hard and she pretty much died in my arms. The whole situation was just like a prolonged nightmare, and one that I feel like I'm waking up to again and again every day. I know that by the time I was holding her she was already gone, she'd stopped responding to her name or any stimulus around her at least 20 minutes before the end came, but it's something that will never leave me.

Well, anyway, life is this way and this is part of the contract we sign up for when getting a pet. Chances are you will almost certainly outlive them, regardless of when they pass. Ironically the more you love them, the worse it is when they go. It seems cruel and unfair in a lot of ways, but I've been through this before and I know in time the pain dulls and you just keep going. The first few weeks and months are just the worst, though, especially when it comes out of nowhere like this. Four weeks ago I was taking her out for walks like nothing was wrong, and now she's gone forever. As you said, it really, really sucks.

But yeah, it hurts and it'll hurt for a while to come. My condolences right back at you, it is indeed a rough thing to ensure. Not much you can do other than remember the good times and be grateful for the time you had with them.
 
Yeah, I know exactly what you mean by the emotional connection. I've known people who like animals and they have pets but that's really all there is to that relationship. Every animal I've ever had is a part of my family and they are treated as such. When I was a teenager, my family and I went to New York to visit my stepdad's family. It was upstate New York which has plenty of rural areas, one of which we were headed to. Not much about that trip is memorable but one of the things I do remember is pulling up to this house and seeing this dog on a very short leash tied to a tree stump in direct sunlight. It was my stepdad's son's house. I asked him about the dog and he said "that dog is chained to that stump every day of the year unless my stepfather takes him hunting." I just remember being like "well what the fuck?" Coming from a home where animals are treated like family, that just didn't compute. I don't understand why you would have a pet and then do that shit.

One unfortunate thing I've noticed with vets over the years is that sometimes they seem to be guessing. Part of me understands that it's hard to be conclusive. The other part holds this resentment like "wait a minute, you told me..." I think for me, I wanted the vet to tell us it was time to consider euthanasia but she never did. She said it was entirely up to us, which is a terrible decision to have to make. You second guess it, wondering if its too early. The entire process is fucked really. In the end, I'm sure we made the right decision but in that moment, nothing feels like the right decision. I'll tell you, I don't know if I can do it again. I know the good outweighs the bad, and maybe it's because it's still too fresh, but I can't even imagine having another dog right now.

Your situation sounds pretty brutal to be honest. I was in a more controlled environment and had vet techs explaining everything that was happening in detail, letting me know how long it was going to take and all that stuff. It sucks any way you look at it, but coming home from a trip and then immediately dealing with something that heavy is quite unfortunate. I hope things start looking up soon, man.
 
@The Grayfox have you seen the new 'Who Killed WCW?' Vice series? I feel like it's been fairly good so far, and they've got a decent selection of people as talking heads, including some of the old Turner/WCW staff. The Rock is on there as a talking head as well, which seemed a bit out of place at first, but I believe he's got a hand in producing the series which may explain why.

The only thing I find somewhat amusing is the 'Who Killed WCW?' premise, as if that hasn't been done to death since 2001. By now it's pretty well established that it was a combination of poor management, poor booking and most importantly the fact AOL/TimeWarner simply didn't want WCW on their books and were happy to kill it off. I'm not sure anyone is asking 'Who Killed WCW?' so much as 'Why let it go for practically nothing when much bigger offers were on the table?'

There was an interesting reddit thread I saw a while back which suggested there was an inside job element to WCW getting sold to WWE for peanuts. It was quite convincing, although I hadn't heard about it until reading that thread.
 
I have not watched it yet, but I do plan on it. As you said, it's been done. That question has been answered at this point. I think people keep re-asking it because they like to cause friction. I mean, it's already happening with Ric Flair. I do like the Vice documentaries though. I've been entertained by several of the Dark Side of the Ring episodes and slightly horrified by others.

There are definitely conspiracy theories surrounding it. I mean, Eric Bischoff was about to buy it. He had investors and everything and he was going to completely reboot it with Las Vegas as the new home for it. And they were going to pay much, much more than Vince and the WWE did. There had to be some fuckery there. It's one of the conspiracies in the wrestling world that I believe a lot more than some others.
 
The documentary itself is the usual Vice fare - well presented, well paced, solid narrative flow. If you like DSotR then you should like this as well. So far there's been nothing groundbreaking, and nothing I haven't heard before, but that's mainly just because I've read and watched so much stuff on WCW since it died. I think they'd have to literally start fabricating total BS to reveal anything new to me.



This was the reddit thread I was thinking of.
 
It's pretty crazy because if that is in fact an illegal deal, I'm surprised that never came up. It wouldn't be at all surprising to find out that Vince McMahon was involved in shady business deals though. In fact, I'd say its more likely than not just based on that.
 
Man, what's going on over there on Smackdown? It's the start of the Samoan World Order or something. Every few weeks, somebody is debuting. I was really hoping that Jacob Fatu was going to come in as a babyface though and side with Roman. Obviously all of this is leading to Bloodline vs New Bloodline, with Hikuleo still yet to debut. Problem is, who's left to side with Roman? Just the Usos? Are they going to interject Sami and Cody? They're running a very serious risk of a babyface Roman Reigns outshining Cody Rhodes. The crowd is going to love Roman as a tweener. I imagine it's going to be a very Stone Cold-esque thing.

The Wyatt Sicks (6) debuted on Monday. I'm not sure what I was expecting for their debut, but it wasn't that. I actually enjoyed it and I think their look is pretty cool. It was very Devils Rejects. Then of course a picture of them out of character getting food after the show surfaces. Still, I thought it was well done and I hope they don't fumble the faction. But they probably will. The only faction that hasn't fumbled under HHH is The Bloodline for obvious reasons. The Pride? The Final Testament? LWO, even Judgment Day who they're trying to make a big deal, really isn't working. You could make the argument that Alpha Academy has been seeing some action and decent storytelling I guess.
 
It's been a really long time now since I've watched any current wrestling, but I can say for sure I have no faith in WWE doing any kind of 'supernatural' story correctly. They always seem to take it too far, and it seems like they've done that from the off with this one, going to unnecessary extremes. Until they learn that less is often more, these kinds of things will never work.

I did see AEW posted a 502k viewership figure this week, which is staggeringly low. I don't even watch the PPVs anymore, so I don't really know what's going on, but it sounds like even the hardcores are beginning to lose interest in the product, which is never a good sign.
 
AEW is great if you're only interested in 5* matches. WWE is the choice now for literally everything else.

It's becoming obvious that AEW's early success was heavily predicated on WWE being in a creative slump. As soon as that changed, so did people's viewing habits.
 
Yeah, WWE is still on fire which is not good for AEW. I think Meltzer or some other writer said that "Vince McMahon being ousted from WWE was the worst possible thing that could've happened to AEW." And I believe that to be true. AEW on it's own is fine, but Tony Khan trying to compete with WWE is just not going to happen.

I saw Booker T and Jim Ross say that they will never work with Vice again after the Who Killed WCW? series. Apparently they did some clever editing.
 
I can't say I've noticed anything majorly egregious with the editing or out of context quotes, honestly, but maybe I just wasn't paying attention. It's produced in part by the Rock's company though, so presumably they won't work with him again, either. Expect Booker to resign his WWE position any moment now /s

In terms of AEW, they had three critical things coincide which has, imo, sunk them. The Vince scandals forcing him out of WWE, leading to the company's creative renaissance, is definitely one factor. CM Punk and the fallout from Brawl out and Brawl In is another factor, simply because things have never gone back to the way they were since Brawl out happened, and Punk was a huge draw for AEW whether people want to admit it or not. The final major factor is, in my view, the purchase of ROH and subsequent hijacking of AEW television by the ROH product. This is personally what turned me off from AEW, and I've never really gotten back into it. The roster was already bloated pre-ROH, but got much worse afterwards, not to mention it being stranger for male competitors to not have a title of some kind due to the sheer amount of belts now in the company.

AEW needs a pretty huge intervention to return to positive momentum, from where I'm sitting, and I don't think it's going to happen any time soon. The damage done may well be terminal, insofar as AEW being considered a genuine WWE competitor as opposed to a distant, niche #2 promotion.
 
I agree on all of those things. The AEW fanbase seems to have selective memory. They're very much all for saying AEW didn't need Punk, he was never a draw for them, etc. It's just not true. When Punk showed up, AEW was immediately on fire. Tony Khan knew this, which is why he tried so hard to keep Punk there and gave him multiple chances. I also believe it just wasn't a good fit. Where Punk is now, he seems genuinely happy and people around him are saying he is happy and people are happy to be there with him. I think Punk likes some of the old school ways pro wrestling used to be. That respect level. It seems there isn't a lot of that in AEW. Punk came up shaking the veteran's hands every week, going to them for advice, all that stuff. I think AEW is a lot more relaxed than that.

100% agree with the ROH stuff. I don't understand why when you already have a product that so over saturated with talent, why you would do that. I imagine Tony Khan's logic was to buy ROH and have partnerships with NJPW, TNA and AAA with the thought being "all the smaller promotions can team up and that'll really take down WWE." It didn't work, nor did it ever have any chance to. He's too focused on trying to compete instead of focusing his energy on making his company better.

AEW needs somebody else in charge, not a fan fantasy booking. I know that sounds harsh, but that's what this is.