Males and Females
- Thread starter damnromulans
- Start date
Dak
mentat
Dak
mentat
Is short a "type"? I guess it could be but that's kind of vague. I think it is fairly obvious men generally prefer partners shorter than themselves, but I thought that in the last 100 years or so that people have been getting taller across the board?
PhlegethonVeins
Autopsy Obsessed
Every model you have posted save one would easily qualify as obese, medically.
Jimmy... Dead.
contemplative curmudgeon
Short women are sexy imo
I like a chick around 5'2 135 tight body (small waist, boop butt, shapely legs w calves, small breast, broad shoulders), w a decent face, nice hands and feet. These are the physical traits I am drawn to, Its evolution baby.
I like a chick around 5'2 135 tight body (small waist, boop butt, shapely legs w calves, small breast, broad shoulders), w a decent face, nice hands and feet. These are the physical traits I am drawn to, Its evolution baby.
Mort Divine
Shrine Maiden of the In-Crowd
Manic Ferocity
Active Member
- Nov 5, 2006
- 5,280
- 559
- 113
I never felt "threatened" by a woman's physique but I've always been more attracted to shorter women. If anything, I feel threatened by strong self-reliant women but that's the way I like it and those are the women I usually go for.
Satanstoenail
My Larpstyle determines my Derpstyle
SentinelSlain
Suck my joined date.
- Nov 21, 2007
- 10,015
- 153
- 63
Vimana
Member
- Mar 2, 2007
- 11,671
- 20
- 38
That, and being hotter in general, from what I've read. Apparently men have been staying the same.
arg
Active Member
- Jun 4, 2008
- 5,745
- 1,442
- 113
if this evolution into shortness thing is true, luckily i won't live to see the day every woman is 5 feet or under. tall women are just more impressive to me.
wow that's the exact opposite of my type, i like tall and docile women.
broad shoulders and calves are ok only if they have the height to compensate. overall proportions matter. otherwise they remind me of Gimli from LotR.
Master_Yoda77
Juggalo
AllShallFall
Senior Member
SentinelSlain
Suck my joined date.
- Nov 21, 2007
- 10,015
- 153
- 63
Shorter? No way - each generation is taller than the last, at least in many parts of the world.
Everyone likes different types, I think the "male archetype" is easier to pin down than the female one though - tall, top-heavy and with muscle. Preference for amount of muscle varies. I'd say for females most dudes seem to prefer shorter than them and narrower in the middle than on the top or bottom, with some muscle and some fat. How much muscle and fat varies a lot.
Everyone likes different types, I think the "male archetype" is easier to pin down than the female one though - tall, top-heavy and with muscle. Preference for amount of muscle varies. I'd say for females most dudes seem to prefer shorter than them and narrower in the middle than on the top or bottom, with some muscle and some fat. How much muscle and fat varies a lot.
SentinelSlain
Suck my joined date.
- Nov 21, 2007
- 10,015
- 153
- 63
Sorry if this appears to come from nowhere, but I just wondered if anyone agreed with me here:
in life, to deal with women you need to be one of three kinds of man
1) loveshy loser who wishes women either thought like men or that they were the innocent romantic sweeties from ages / books gone by
2) arrogant idiot, perhaps from a backwards culture that has to have allowances made for
3) metrosexual strange "thing" that makes excuses for women a lot, cares massively about being "cool" and mocks others to appear good in comparison a lot
in life, to deal with women you need to be one of three kinds of man
1) loveshy loser who wishes women either thought like men or that they were the innocent romantic sweeties from ages / books gone by
2) arrogant idiot, perhaps from a backwards culture that has to have allowances made for
3) metrosexual strange "thing" that makes excuses for women a lot, cares massively about being "cool" and mocks others to appear good in comparison a lot
Similar threads
