And you believe the moon landing was staged right? More conspiracy mumbo jumbo.
When did I say I thought the moon land ing was staged? You abuse the word "conspiracy", Zionist media does have a lot of power on it's allies like the US... Murdoch, owner of Fox news, has long been a supported of Zionist Agenda..
Iraq was better off before the war no doubt. But the civil problems you mention isnt a class between poor and rich, which would be a civil dispute, but between rival religious factions making it a religious war amongst countrymembers. And Palestine, its a joke. They want oppression to end? Well guess what, time to ante up and play ball. They wont ever win against israel. Too many western allies. No middle eastern country will have the upper hand. Concession is the only thing. IS what they did wrong? Probably, but fighting, suicide bombing, rocket attacks, those things wont get them their own state. ANd now seriously, Palestine..what a joke. They are going to tear themselves apart. They can't even stick together for a common goal. Violence seems to be the universal answer in the muslim world. Dont like a politician? Blow up his fucking car. Dont like the other party? Take them into the streets and execute them in front of their wives and children.
Other than helping in depleting Iraq's main export making recovery near impossible considering their already large financial problems resulting from the Eight-Year War. They finally began restoring pipelines and re-establishing their economy until the Iraq War, when pretty much all their Oil Export Facilities, Refineries, etc, were either destroyed or claimed. Other than hugely escalating civil problems into a decared civil war, that did not arise, and if not for tension put on economy, infrastructure, etc, in Iraq by the US army, it wouldn't of developed to this extreme. The main reason the War in Iraq occured was because the US believed Iraq were a threat to themselves (The US), not because of civil problems in Iraq, etc. Of course, they eventually discovered there was no threat and all that the war resulted in was a complete disestablishment of the country, escalating civil problems further and further. There was no threat from Iraq of a possible attack, the Afghanistan war was just, but we should have stayed out of Iraq for the time being, since it wasn't until the US army came in, broke down all the system of laws, destroyed any economic worth in Iraq, etc, that problems picked up.
And do you understand the term oppression, because incase you didn't notice, it's very different from the word "terrorism". Oppression means to be targeted by the cruel exercise of power in a society or social group. Israel have already forced inferiority onto Palestine, making almost everything that occurs in Israel/Palestine, under their control. They made it illegal for Palestine to have a media news program, they constantly put huge delays on peace processes for near no reason at all, as to start some sort of minimal civil unrest due to continued oppression so that way the blame can be put on Palestine for stopping peace process after a decade of waitting as in the Oslo Accords for example. And also, any Palestinian terrorism is not the result of Arafat's decisions, etc, it's not the government going and killing Israelis. It's complete civil exhaustion of economic and human rights.. There's nothing that can be done to stop such civil unrest (and any nation in the same predicament (Sp?) would act similarly, or probably more extremely), until Israel begins to first, actually start a peace process they mean to go through with to return MINIMAL political power to Palestine and put an end to Israeli's totalitarianistic regime on Palestine. From social norms such as degrading Palestinians on a daily basis through insult, racism and assault, to the legality of firing openly upon crowds not posing a threat, as well as using mass-torture to get answers.. Many of which acts violate the International Human Rights created by the Geneva Convention.. Not just are Israeli casualties not even a fifth of Palestinian casulties, they're government promoted, while Palestinian casualties are just due to extreme civil unrest that logically, would develop from over half a century of near half a population of unemployment, homelessness and lack of justice to be enforced when Israeli leaders allow the deaths of thousands of Palestinians from needless murder occuring daily to mass murders of Palestinian civilians, such as Sabra and Shatila (of which, every one of the survivors claimed to have seen the Israeli army in or around the city with the Israeli-lead Lebanese army, along with oddly placed Israeli checkpoints at the main exits and crossroads of the city..). CIVIL rest cannot be ended, by Palestinian officials or anyone, until Israeli Government officials ends it's totalitarianistic regime on Palestine.
Free will gives me the right. In this country we can express ourselves, unlike most of the rest of the world. If you believe your religious texts, you must obviously believe stories like King Arthur, Beowulf, or anything with fairies and dragons, that shit is almost more believable. Closed minds are what have brought the world to its current state.
There's no possible way you've ever read the Qur'an. The historical stories of the Qur'an are fairly similar if not exactly those of the Old Testament.. The idea of God is accepted by billions of people, free will gives you the right to voice your opinion that you think God is the same as fairies and dragons, but no right can ensure the correctness of your statement.
[/quote]Anyways, lets say what you want happens.. All religions end.. Then what? Complete peace and no violence? Of course not, new groups would form and would fight, the reason all these problems occur is the PEOPLE.. It's not a religious reason.. And what makes Islam more evil? Never has there been as large scale a RELIGIOUS killing as the crusades or Inquisition in Islam. Al Queda is an outlawed radical Islamist group that's hated by the entire world, not just the superior Christians.. Either way, honestly, if the morals we have to look for in the future, represented by people such as yourself that would gladly look upon the death of a religion and the center of which it is peacefully practiced (a Church of a Mosque), I would much rather keep the morals of Christianity, Islam and Judaism, as they've kept extremist groups from prevailing in the Middle East, the Americas, Europe, etc.. Even if all religious morals were taken away, extremism would still exist, as it is people who are evil, not religions, there would always be a small amount of people would just find another idea to abuse and turn into their own evil, radical views, and without religious morals, if anything, this form of extremism would grow.[/quote]
Nah no religion and the world would be chaos of course. If we were all atheists we would still be going at it, tons of evil people everywhere no matter if they are religious or not. Serial killers for example. But religion is a HUGE catalyst for evil. The crusades and inquisition were bad, I wont argue there. But to keep arguing that point as a basis on Christianity being bad is like saying all white people are bad because 200 years ago some morons owned slaves. It is what happens TODAY that defines a people. And today Islam is evil.
Can you honestly say that any other religion has spawned so many extremist groups?
Show examples of how Islam has contributed ANYTHING (besides Algebra..thanks alot) to the world.
Why would Dubai forbid the hiring of any muslims to work there? Does the ruler realize that being muslim is not the best thing to be, especially when trying to attract a tourism industry (smart thinking for when oil goes tits up)
This whole topic is about why Islam should be destroyed, and I am seeing nothing to show otherwise. It is just the same old muslim rhetoric about Jews this, Palestine oh poor Palestine, we are peaceful..no really we are trust us![/QUOTE]
Exactly like you said, even if we were all atheists, there would still be fighting, if anything it would be worse as at least religion presents morals for normal, sane people to use. Which surprisingly for you, I'm sure, there are just as many percentage wise in the Middle East as there are in the US, Mexico, France, China, etc. If lets say Afghanistan had the largest media power, I'm sure they could make just a convincing arguement that it's indeed the US that was evil, they'll be able to do it fairly easily. They could make claims about how daily in just one city, like LA for example, there are almost 100 extremely violent attacks made (that doesn't mean fist fights of physical assaults.. It means gunshot or knife wounds) daily along 1-2 murders every day, in just one city of the USA (all according to fbi.gov sources).. Along with causing app. 200,000 casualties in Iraq, etc. By doing do, they would take attention of the Taliban/Al Queda, and put watchers awe and disgust of the crime going on in the US. The strength of media really determines the support of a population. There's crime, extremism, racism, etc, everywhere, just the spotlight changes every once in a while.. But the reason I use history as examples a lot is because history can't be skewed by media, etc, history is history as it happened, and for the past 1000 years, the majority of mass-murders occured in Christian nations of Europe, the Inquisition was no small occurance that I'm just bringing up again and again. It last over half a millenium and was COMPLETELY UNPROVOKED murder of countless Jews and pretty much all non-Catholics. It was the Muslim world.. Religious intolerance has never been prevelent in the Muslim world to anywhere near the extent it was in Catholic European countries, just lately, in the US it's been a prime target of media whorage. And the civil problems in Iraq are more a civil struggle than religious, and the crime rate was not a tenth, before, of what it is now. I'm not going to use the term terrorist group, because while all large populations' crime rates even out over time, but because the US is at war with much of the middle east, they've used media to apply the word "terrorism" to Muslim violence and only Muslim violence only, while violence is still as prevalent elsewhere for just as unjust reasons. And what do you mean old Muslim rhetoric? It wasn't until the 20th century that Muslims even had any problems with Jewish populations at all.. They sent military forces into Spain to aid in ending Inquisition just over 100 years ago. It wasn't until ZIONISTS (Keyword=Zionists, not Jews, as many Jews oppose Zionists as well) came into Palestine, made claims that Palestinians never even existed and that because they were there milleniums ago, it was rightfully their's.. They bulldozed towns and cities and anyone who remained in the buildings, they just pushed Palestinians off the land and made it legal to kill any who returned to the newly Israeli land. Other than the countless Palestinian civilians killed by the Israelis during the formation of Israel, many hundreds of thousands died from starvation, disease, etc, after being forced out of their homes, virtually killing their economy and depriving them of jobs a supply of food, etc... This invasion just continues and continues, more Palestinian land is being taken and there's no denying the horrible treatment of Palestinians compared to Israeli's, who live free, normal lives in their Israeli nation.
What's really a joke? The PNA. They have no power at all over Palestinian land, so how would the Palestinians' "ante up and play ball", without any form of government or leadership? They can't, and Israel doesn't want them, too either. Israeli officials like Rafael Eitan have stated, The Goal of Zionism is to turn Palestine (and parts of Jordan, etc) into an entirely Jewish State. This is related to the reason why the Oslo Accords peace peace process when on for a decade even though both sides had agreed on it for years, they were just waitting for civil unrest to occur like it would in any nation, and when it does, they revoke the peace process and blame Palestine.