Where the hell do you think I am saying Taliban and Al Qaeda are the same? I said I can tell the difference in the fighting style, its real easy to see close up. Ive never associated Taliban with 9/11 either. All they were was a group of religious nutjobs.
You said Pakis who supported the Taliban were for some reason celebrating 9/11, they'd have no reason to. And the number who joined the Taliban's cause was also very small.
So people living and born in pakistan, while not under direct control of the government are somehow..not pakistani? Interesting thought process.
I was saying this in the aspect that their views completely differed from those of the Pakistani government. And none of the Agencies that represented sections of FATA aided the Taliban, the small amount of people who did were an extremely small minority.
I've never talked about the taliban civil war. I might have said eastern border, that might be the confusion. I keep thinking eastern AFghanistan. Western side of pakistan is filled will taliban and al qaeda groups. Ive personally performed combat missions in the area, and bagged a few of the buggers.
Well FATA is on the western border of the Pakistan. Every FATA agency condemned Al Qaeda, and gave no support to the Taliban, and there is an Agency for every couple of thousand people in FATA, which means there's no part of it where an entire town or village would be supporting either organization. The only ones who did support said organizations were not associated with any governing forces of Pakistan, they did so on their own, and the amount that did this was excruciatingly small.
As I watch people use human feces for fuel, and mix MUD and STRAW to build a hut, I am sure that it isnt the spanish style you are talking about. THe base we took over was built out of concrete, and most of the surrounding town. But the outlying dwellings were all mud huts. I stood there and watched them build'em. It was like looking into 1000 years ago.
..No, people weren't shitting into cars. If they can afford a car, they can afford oil in such an oil-rich nation. You lie so much.. Please show me some pictures of said mud huts, if this really occured, I'm sure there'd a mad clusterfuck by all the human rights organizations to fix this. Put there aren't, and considering the unemployment rates in Pakistan is lower and their economy is stronger than most European countries, I seriously doubt this.
Did you know of Frances 9% unemployed, 60% is muslim? Now you do.
Kind of like how 99% of 100% of statements you make are complete bull shit
And you seem to forget why Israel had to come back to their homeland. Obviously driven out. First by Romans (before Islam) who hated them and the christians when they rolled around. Then as an Islam identity moved into the area the rest where hustled on out too.
They weren't hustled out, if you knew anything about the History of Islam you'd know that Christians, Jews, and all former inhabitants of the area were allowed to stay in the city, unharmed, under full military protection against outside nations. And then the Crusaders came and killed everyone, all civilians, christian, jew, muslim, man, woman, child, etc.. Jews were allowed to live there freely, but they still wanted to perform an ethnic cleansing on their Jewish state, so they "hustled" the Palestinian Arabs right on out of their homes to make room for Israeli settlements..
Palestine is old and tired. It is high time they move back into Jordan.
Palestine is old and tired now after over a half a century of complete oppression and forced homelessness. But if the Palestinians want their land, then it should be their's, as it has been for over a millenium.
Hell the whole middle east as it stands today was formed completely by Europe. There was no palestine before the 1900's. It was just another region of wasteland with wandering inhabitants under the Ottoman empire.
In 1878, Palestine's population was exactly 462,465 Muslim and Christian Arabs. They were all united under one governing force, the Ottoman Empire, with local governing powers. Along with a strong economy, infrastructure, towns, villages, markets, commerce, universities, etc. It was like an American sub-urb during the 1800s, it was not uninhabited.
Even after their fall the British coined the word Palestine as their little strop of land. The only reason the Brits left, and that a Jewish state was formed was because a couple groups of Hebrew Hammer's were pissing in their tea. The muslims weren't looking for their own state. So what happened when the one proactive group got what they wanted? Jealously set in. The best advice for palestinians, besides suicide bombing other muslims, would be to go dig ditches in countries like Kuwait and Saudi Arabia where they can make some money and ...GASP..move on with their lives! I forgot where god told everyone that life is fair.
Whether it was called Palestine at the time or not is irrelevent. It was a highly populated area by Arabic Muslims and Christians. They inhabited the land, all the British Mandate did originally was give power of Transjordan to the already existant government in the Palestinian area. While all this happening, Jewish terrorist groups like Lehi and Irgun attacked Britain and Palestinians. They killed British soldiers and Palestinian civilians..
And btw, there were no Palestinian civil conflicts until the late 1980s. Until Israel created and put into place, Hamas, to help completely destroy Palestine. Why the FUCK should Palestinians be forced to leave their HOMES, business, possessions, etc, just because some Zionist terrorists attack them? Life not being fair is shown when you're crossing the street and someone drives through a puddle and you get soaked.. What you're saying is like if someone murders one of your close family members then, when taken to court the excuse used is "Life ain't fair".. You're having trouble distinguishing between unfairness and illegal, extremist invasions and murders..
Yes. I was intolerant of my neighbors chihuahua constantly barking, so I fed him some bakers chocolate. 8 hours of sound sleep have followed ever since.
As you might know, most words have 2, 3, even hundreds of different definitions. What you were accusing me of for a ridiculous reason was this:
unwilling to grant equal freedom of expression especially in religious matters b : unwilling to grant or share social, political, or professional rights : BIGOTED
The definition you used in that example was: unable or unwilling to endure
So, for the most part, your sentence doesn't work.
No but muslims are quick to ignore the facts that their religion is murdering thousands upon thousands in Africa, and that several countries have had their asses saved, and owe their entire ways of life to Europeans and Americans. But, do to intolerance will never acknowledge it. I will say Kuwaitis are still very friendly people, as are the folks in Dubai. But then, muslims are really wanted in Dubai so its a nice place, no crime, no excessive poverty.
Since when are Muslims murdering thousands upon thousands in Africa...? Are you Jerry Falwell by any chance?
While religion promotes good values, the thought of more good than bad is probably wrong. Look at the catholic priests raping young boys. I know TONS of christians who go to church every sunday, and get pissed when I say Goddamn or Jesus Titty Fucking Christ. But when away from home are the first to break their vows to their spouse. I loved being deployed cuz the religious nuts were the first ones to try to get laid or go crazy. Religion just confines people so much that insane and/or violent outburts WILL happen. Fucking monks self immolating, islamic suicide bombers blowing up schools and market places, christian explorers wiping out civilizations. I don't believe the good outweighs the bad.
The Priests who molest small boys are doing it because they're sick, perverted, child molesting bastards.. It's not religion that made them want to molest boys, it's their fucked up nature, and they'd be out there on the frontline, every morning, raping small boys, whether or not Christianity existed
The same Christian explorers would still have explored and killed, with or without christianity, and they probably would have killed more horribly and inhumanely if not for religion. Suicide bombers in the middle east would still be attacking Israel if Islam didn't exist, for the same reason they are now, because they stole their land and won't leave their country. It's like you said, "Should of Fought Harder Pussies", it was their land and as long as Israel continues to occupy and kill them, they'll keep resisting.
Look at any muslim country that has members of their government promoting the destruction or death of other people. Iran and Afghanistan are perfect examples. Yemen too, but they are such a no one gives a fuck country you dont hear about it. Saudi is real bad also, the funnel funds to several terrorist groups in Israel and Syria/Lebanon. Multiple muslim countries have state funded terrorism. Libya used to. The guy owned up and gave every bad weapon he had to America several years ago. I don't think anyone has a problem with Libya anymore (still a shithole). So how is a government tolerant that openly calls for the murder of a fucking book author, for example?
The only reason Afghanistan was under such radical law was because they were just coming out of occupation and it was complete luck that the Taliban were able to take power.
Iran just told Israel that they would defend Palestine if Israel continued to kill and occupy Palestinians.
A small few oil-rich Saudi's gave some money to Hamas and Saudi Arabian government did all they could to cut off this funding.. Government can't have complete control over their entire population, but Saudi Arabia's been pretty succesful at ending any funds going to Hamas..
Also, Please be specific with your examples or else it's impossible to respond, you just say shit like "In Libya, some guy was a terrorist, but then gave up.."
Israeli terrorism, thats a funny term. To get Israel sure, but now? No way. Everything Israel does is in its own self defense. Do they randomly launch rockets into some random palestinian refugee camp, just to instill some fear? Nope. Do palestinians? Yep. "Lets just fire some rockets into this fucking town that isnt doing anything, hopefully we can kill some kids and older jews..and they will move out, then we move in!" And sadly palestinian people have worked themselves into a rut, hence your checkpoints. Is Israel putting bombs in cars, sneaking them into palestinian areas and blowing, let say, a hotel? Nope, but palestinians are doing that to Israel. Do you know what happens then? What is a checkpoint Alex? You should go over and get some first hand experience.
Show me one example of Palestinians firing rockets at Israel as a whole aside from a few bomb attacks per year that result in not even a fifth of the deaths from Israeli's. And FFS, Sabra and Shatila, there ya go for modern Israeli mass slaughters of thousands of Palestinian civilians all at one time. That one massacre accounts for more deaths than all of Palestine's anti-Israel terrorism in the past decade..
Anyways, why would Israeli's have to bomb Palestinians when they have the money to just shoot at them? Palestinians don't have the weaponry Israel does, that's why they have to use bombs. While Israel kills countless civilians, just look at their assassinations, in the assassination of Ahmad Yassin, they killed 8 bypassers and injured over 100 others.. Just an example of bombings, but like I said, answer this, why would a highly acclaimed, patriotic Israeli professor, Tanya Reinhart, use false information? Her information has been backed by many human rights groups. Israel kills an average of 5 Palestinians posing no threat, daily..
Ok this is how terrorism works. You fight amongst civilians, dressed as them. It is a tactic, and works very well. THe problem you encounter when fighting these terrorists is that you cannot distinguish them from the crowd. Ive seen muzzle flash come from a crowd of civilians. That meant some moron was popping shots at us. We could have fired a couple grenades in and killed him but of course we would have taken out a shitload of people without weapons. Im not calling them innocent, because probability laws will show they most likely are going to pick up arms.
You're just saying chances are all Muslims have weaponry and will just start shooting.. Tanya Reinharts' studies count only unarmed civilians. Not ones who had firearms, or else they are no longer civilians by definition, they would be militants. And what reason would she have to go against her country if these civilians were really militants?
So in palestine, this is how the militants make it look like Israel is murdering civilians. Jag off X shoots off a rocket from a mildly wooded area. An Israeli Apache flies around, sees the guy hiding with his infrared camera (god they have no idea what is coming!!) and fires a rocket, or pops them with the 30m (or whatever the jews use) Then as propaganda, all you do is TAKE AWAY THE GUNS..because the fighters are wearing CIVILIAN CLOTHES. NOT UNIFORMS. Take a picture "oh jesus poor civilians blasted by Israeli Helicopters for no reason!" Boom, propaganda that is eaten up by the likes of you and countless other sheep in this vast world.
Wtf? American media has always portrayed Israel in a positive light. Never in any major American newspaper was the assassination of Ahmed Yassin called an Assassination.. And never do you see any reports of Palestinian civilians dying in American newspaper... What would be the point of Palestinians trying to frame Israel when no American newspaper reports on anti-Palestinian civilian terrorism? You just made up a scenario and claimed it is the main cause of Palestinians. Your arguements are just pathetic lies of a braindead redneck who listens to anything he hears in the News.
Killing in any capacity is terrible. And I check all SORTS of news wires and on occasion hear about palestinians being killed but it isn't as bad as you are making it out to be. It's like how the media makes Iraq to seem like a bottomless pit of nothingness. That country will probably pull it shit together one day, they have all the resources to be the richest nation in the land. And even though I hate seeing Americans get killed, especially in a foreign country that sucks, guess what its war, shit happens, people die, civilians die. At least no one carpet bombs like we did in WW2, or there would be no palestinians left, and Iraq would be a smoldering pile of rubble. There would be no ground troops killed because no one can stop our Air Force.
Plenty of Israeli professors. Listen, ISRAELI-born Professors, have agreed with the fact that Israeli government terrorizes Palestinian civilians. What reason would they have to criticize the country they're born into unless said acts were so horrible they needed to be dealt with.
Zionist is lumped in with Jew and muslims live off this stereotype. And saying beause Israel had the land 1000 years ago, for probably a 1000 years before that, is no claim is ludicrous. So I guess the guys who got their identity from some limeys back in 1920 have more of a claim on the land (they wasted.)
Since when are Jews and Zionists combined? Even khomeini, as extremist as he was, said that Muslims should show Jews and Christians living with them. And they are, zionists are not even all Jews. Many zionists are christians who believe a Jewish state of Israel must be established before the Prophecy of the book of revelations can be fulfilled where Christians will take the Jews and force them to either covert to Christianity or die.
And Israel didn't have the land 1000 years ago, they didn't have it 2000 years ago, they had before the first century and it was still considerably inhabited by Arabians at the time, as well. And then the Christians came and the Muslims have had it for thousands of years, of course, the Romans throwing the Jews out was horrible, etc, etc.. But when the Muslims took power, they were the only people who occupied the land and allowed people of all religion and race to stay with the same freedom as anyone else. Then the zionists invaded, killed and illegally occupied the Palestinian land because they believe their religion gives them the right to do so. If anyone killed for religion in the middle east, it was zionists.
South Park references again. YOu should watch it, turn the V-chip off. They make fun of everybody, especially Jews and mormons. Its great.
I>You at South Park knowledge, you didn't even remember what Mrs. Garrison said in the Muhammad-Fish Hat episode...
British killed Native AMericans who were allied with the French. French Indian war was just that. And indians fought alongside the Brits and Americans in that war.
Wow you don't know shit about history:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_and_Indian_War
The only reason France stood a chance against Britain was because of their alliances with many different Native American groups. The British killed Native Americans long before the French and Indian War, and because the inhumane ways the British killed Native Americans, the Natives easily sided with France, of whom peacefully traded with them, against Britain. Although British forces did outnumber them about 5 to 1.
And China would never make it across the sea. Their last real test of mettle was the Korean war, and some messing around in Vietnam. There is a reason for the quote "Yeah, and I'm a Chinese Jet pilot." Chances are China couldnt take out Taiwan. China's inferior navy could never make it to America. And nuclear strikes, well that wont happen considering the average nuke sitting in the ground in South Dakota or in a bunker in PA is about 100 times stronger than fatman and littleboy, it would just be too destructive.
I said serious damage, not conquer. If they were first to deploy weapons and were able to use said weapons to destroy our main nuclear weapon facilities, we'd be extremely fucked. But that was just an example of something completely irrelevent to whether China would win in a war against the US