I'd run XP just so you can be assured of compatibility with all your plugins and shit.
And then when the next run of plug ins come out, they wont work with XP because by then people will have moved on from bothering to make them for an operating system that is already more than 8 years old![]()
I think you should get what I wont mention.
I'd run XP just so you can be assured of compatibility with all your plugins and shit.
MACINTOSH, MUTHAFUCKAS!!!!!
even though I do not own one.
It's really best to let any Microsoft product be tested by the 'me first' crowd. Found that out w/ Vista.
I'm still on RC1.
In the final release did they stop obscuring vital Control Panel features in retarded 'advanced menus'? I've felt they got just about everything right apart from that. It's way too hard to find essential features by diving through all those stupid menus. It's like using Cubase.
But, fact in the few past.
If talking only by design、 even XP x64 can treats 32TB.
2 socket hardware, such as Opteron 2000 number processor platform had maximum memory 128GB.
Microsoft says support that only what it was possible to prove.
And now, Xeon 5500 number processor platform can support maximum up to 144GB.
Microsoft will do the proof examination of 144GB in the near future.