This is kind of an abstract post on musical philosophy. Its in a stream o consciousness form. Could be super profound or it could be shit. I havent decided yet. Hopefully, though, some neat discourse will ensue afterward:
Ive met MANY people that say that music is my life and that I couldnt live without music. I dont think that they may actually realize that the love they have for music may not be love, but more so a crutch and a dependency. Ive never disagreed with the notion that music is important (its a MAJOR component in my life), but Ive always found the notion that music being the base of someones life, to be rather absurd. In fact, for this VERY reason, I think there been a lack of GOOD and UNIQUE music out in the world today, or at least a decrease in it.
How can this be?
In biology there is a term called Hybrid Vigor. Look it up. This notion basically says that when two opposite type animals or plants breed they give to that offspring a WIDE range of differing characteristics (genotypes, phenotypes, alleles, etc.). When this happens for the whole species, this allows for when a virus may come or certain predators attack, there is less chance that it will wipe out that entire species as some are less capable of fighting a flu, some cant run as fast to outrun certain predators, etc.. Hybrid vigor is something that allows for BETTER offspring.
So whats the point? How does this apply to music?
When musicians look at THEMSELVES (i.e. other musicians) for inspiration that usually got their inspiration from other musicians, the offspring is a HOMOGENEOUS result. This in turn creates WEAK offspring (music), uninspired and dull. This is inbreeding to a certain degree. Why is it that a band like Agalloch can create so much interest? I believe it is in part because of their influences outside of the music realm. This draws others in.
The answer for better music is not to get more music but LESS music. The inspiration can then be drawn from real life experiences and thus creating a more vivid and genuine portrait of the art. There are exceptions, but should be a supplement to and expression of life (or death). Overall, it seems as though both musicians and music lovers would benefit from this philosophy or theory.
I like to think of music as the soundtrack to my life. My life is NOT the kaleidoscope to music. Big difference.
Ive met MANY people that say that music is my life and that I couldnt live without music. I dont think that they may actually realize that the love they have for music may not be love, but more so a crutch and a dependency. Ive never disagreed with the notion that music is important (its a MAJOR component in my life), but Ive always found the notion that music being the base of someones life, to be rather absurd. In fact, for this VERY reason, I think there been a lack of GOOD and UNIQUE music out in the world today, or at least a decrease in it.
How can this be?
In biology there is a term called Hybrid Vigor. Look it up. This notion basically says that when two opposite type animals or plants breed they give to that offspring a WIDE range of differing characteristics (genotypes, phenotypes, alleles, etc.). When this happens for the whole species, this allows for when a virus may come or certain predators attack, there is less chance that it will wipe out that entire species as some are less capable of fighting a flu, some cant run as fast to outrun certain predators, etc.. Hybrid vigor is something that allows for BETTER offspring.
So whats the point? How does this apply to music?
When musicians look at THEMSELVES (i.e. other musicians) for inspiration that usually got their inspiration from other musicians, the offspring is a HOMOGENEOUS result. This in turn creates WEAK offspring (music), uninspired and dull. This is inbreeding to a certain degree. Why is it that a band like Agalloch can create so much interest? I believe it is in part because of their influences outside of the music realm. This draws others in.
The answer for better music is not to get more music but LESS music. The inspiration can then be drawn from real life experiences and thus creating a more vivid and genuine portrait of the art. There are exceptions, but should be a supplement to and expression of life (or death). Overall, it seems as though both musicians and music lovers would benefit from this philosophy or theory.
I like to think of music as the soundtrack to my life. My life is NOT the kaleidoscope to music. Big difference.